Ad is loading...
CSHNX vs GMLPX
CSHNX vs GMLPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHNX vs. GMLPX commentary
Apr 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHNX is a Hold and GMLPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GMLPX has more cash in the bank: 1.53B vs. CSHNX (969M). CSHNX (6.39) and GMLPX (6.14) have matching dividends . CSHNX was incepted earlier than GMLPX: CSHNX (11 years) vs GMLPX (12 years). GMLPX (2.08) is less costly to investors than CSHNX (1.48). GMLPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 103.00 vs. CSHNX (25.00). CSHNX has a lower initial minimum investment than GMLPX: CSHNX (2500) vs GMLPX (1000000). CSHNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.57 vs. GMLPX (5.99). GMLPX return over 5 years is better than : 235.01 vs. CSHNX (215.51).
| CSHNX | GMLPX | CSHNX / GMLPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 2.08 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 2.08 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -9.421 | -5.953 | 158% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 969M | 1.53B | 63% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.39 | 6.14 | 104% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.57 | 5.99 | 210% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.03 | 48.49 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | 215.51 | 235.01 | 92% |
| Returns for 10 years | 8.17 | 17.26 | 47% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...