Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSHNX vs GMLPX
CSHNX vs GMLPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHNX vs. GMLPX commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHNX is a Hold and GMLPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GMLPX has more cash in the bank: 1.55B vs. CSHNX (1.02B). GMLPX (6.74) and CSHNX (6.67) have matching dividends . CSHNX was incepted earlier than GMLPX: CSHNX (11 years) vs GMLPX (13 years). GMLPX (6.63) is less costly to investors than CSHNX (1.49). GMLPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 103.00 vs. CSHNX (25.00). CSHNX has a lower initial minimum investment than GMLPX: CSHNX (2500) vs GMLPX (1000000). CSHNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.44 vs. GMLPX (4.38). GMLPX (213.40) and CSHNX (210.02) have equivalent 5 years return.
| CSHNX | GMLPX | CSHNX / GMLPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 6.63 | 22% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 6.63 | 22% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.107 | -1.138 | 97% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.02B | 1.55B | 66% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.67 | 6.74 | 99% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.44 | 4.38 | 124% |
| Returns for 3 years | 66.10 | 55.96 | 118% |
| Returns for 5 years | 210.02 | 213.40 | 98% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.83 | 60.77 | 69% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement