Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSHNX vs GMNPX
CSHNX vs GMNPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHNX vs. GMNPX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHNX is a Hold and GMNPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GMNPX has more cash in the bank: 1.59B vs. CSHNX (1.04B). CSHNX (7.05) and GMNPX (6.80) have matching dividends . CSHNX was incepted earlier than GMNPX: CSHNX (11 years) vs GMNPX (8 years). GMNPX (6.62) is less costly to investors than CSHNX (1.49). GMNPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 103.00 vs. CSHNX (25.00). GMNPX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSHNX: GMNPX (0) vs CSHNX (2500). GMNPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.47 vs. CSHNX (-0.65). CSHNX (193.62) and GMNPX (186.70) have equivalent 5 years return.
| CSHNX | GMNPX | CSHNX / GMNPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 6.62 | 23% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 6.62 | 23% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.159 | 3.002 | 72% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.04B | 1.59B | 66% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.05 | 6.80 | 104% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.65 | 2.47 | -27% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.98 | 52.93 | 113% |
| Returns for 5 years | 193.62 | 186.70 | 104% |
| Returns for 10 years | 67.73 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement