Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSHNX vs GMNPX
CSHNX vs GMNPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHNX vs. GMNPX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHNX is a Hold and GMNPX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GMNPX has more cash in the bank: 1.62B vs. CSHNX (1.08B). CSHNX (6.64) and GMNPX (6.59) have matching dividends . CSHNX was incepted earlier than GMNPX: CSHNX (11 years) vs GMNPX (7 years). GMNPX (6.62) is less costly to investors than CSHNX (1.49). GMNPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 103.00 vs. CSHNX (25.00). GMNPX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSHNX: GMNPX (0) vs CSHNX (2500). CSHNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.86 vs. GMNPX (10.44). GMNPX return over 5 years is better than : 219.24 vs. CSHNX (203.25).
| CSHNX | GMNPX | CSHNX / GMNPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 6.62 | 23% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 6.62 | 23% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.464 | 2.840 | 87% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.08B | 1.62B | 66% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.64 | 6.59 | 101% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.86 | 10.44 | 142% |
| Returns for 3 years | 68.77 | 62.95 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | 203.25 | 219.24 | 93% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.70 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement