Ad is loading...
CSHNX vs GMNPX
CSHNX vs GMNPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHNX vs. GMNPX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHNX is a Hold and GMNPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GMNPX has more cash in the bank: 1.76B vs. CSHNX (1.17B). CSHNX pays higher dividends than GMNPX: CSHNX (7.86) vs GMNPX (6.18). CSHNX was incepted earlier than GMNPX: CSHNX (11 years) vs GMNPX (7 years). GMNPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 102.00 vs. CSHNX (20.00). GMNPX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSHNX: GMNPX (0) vs CSHNX (2500). CSHNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 57.33 vs. GMNPX (39.16). GMNPX (86.51) and CSHNX (85.63) have equivalent 5 years return.
| CSHNX | GMNPX | CSHNX / GMNPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.545 | 7.568 | 126% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.17B | 1.76B | 66% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.86 | 6.18 | 127% |
| Returns for 1 year | 57.33 | 39.16 | 146% |
| Returns for 3 years | 104.90 | 91.70 | 114% |
| Returns for 5 years | 85.63 | 86.51 | 99% |
| Returns for 10 years | 34.46 | N/A | - |