Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSHNX vs HMSFX
CSHNX vs HMSFX Comparison
Open Charts CSHNX vs HMSFX
CSHNX vs HMSFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHNX vs. HMSFX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHNX is a StrongBuy and HMSFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSHNX has more cash in the bank: 1.21B vs. HMSFX (76.7M). HMSFX pays higher dividends than CSHNX: HMSFX (7.96) vs CSHNX (5.83). CSHNX was incepted earlier than HMSFX: CSHNX (12 years) vs HMSFX (12 years). HMSFX (1.92) is less costly to investors than CSHNX (1.46). CSHNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. HMSFX (6.00). CSHNX (2500) and HMSFX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CSHNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.48 vs. HMSFX (13.96). CSHNX return over 5 years is better than : 145.23 vs. HMSFX (135.10).
| CSHNX | HMSFX | CSHNX / HMSFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 1.76 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 1.92 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.961 | 14.505 | 158% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.21B | 76.7M | 1,580% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.83 | 7.96 | 73% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.48 | 13.96 | 125% |
| Returns for 3 years | 97.55 | 78.78 | 124% |
| Returns for 5 years | 145.23 | 135.10 | 108% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.40 | 113.19 | 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers