Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSHNX vs HMSFX
CSHNX vs HMSFX Comparison
Open Charts CSHNX vs HMSFX
CSHNX vs HMSFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHNX vs. HMSFX commentary
Sep 18, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHNX is a Hold and HMSFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSHNX has more cash in the bank: 1.27B vs. HMSFX (78.2M). HMSFX pays higher dividends than CSHNX: HMSFX (7.47) vs CSHNX (5.44). CSHNX was incepted earlier than HMSFX: CSHNX (12 years) vs HMSFX (13 years). HMSFX (1.92) is less costly to investors than CSHNX (1.46). CSHNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. HMSFX (6.00). CSHNX (2500) and HMSFX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CSHNX (22.44) and HMSFX (22.24) have marching annual gain over last year. HMSFX (166.48) and CSHNX (166.25) have equivalent 5 years return.
| CSHNX | HMSFX | CSHNX / HMSFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 1.76 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 1.92 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 29.833 | 20.531 | 145% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.27B | 78.2M | 1,618% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.44 | 7.47 | 73% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.44 | 22.24 | 101% |
| Returns for 3 years | 86.13 | 68.03 | 127% |
| Returns for 5 years | 166.25 | 166.48 | 100% |
| Returns for 10 years | 99.51 | 111.56 | 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement