Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSHNX vs HMSIX
CSHNX vs HMSIX Comparison
Open Charts CSHNX vs HMSIX
CSHNX vs HMSIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHNX vs. HMSIX commentary
Jun 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHNX is a StrongBuy and HMSIX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSHNX has more cash in the bank: 1.22B vs. HMSIX (78.1M). HMSIX pays higher dividends than CSHNX: HMSIX (7.52) vs CSHNX (5.83). CSHNX was incepted earlier than HMSIX: CSHNX (12 years) vs HMSIX (12 years). HMSIX (1.53) and CSHNX (1.46) have similar cost to investors . CSHNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. HMSIX (6.00). CSHNX has a lower initial minimum investment than HMSIX: CSHNX (2500) vs HMSIX (250000). CSHNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.71 vs. HMSIX (17.20). CSHNX (139.10) and HMSIX (133.60) have equivalent 5 years return.
| CSHNX | HMSIX | CSHNX / HMSIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 1.45 | 101% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 1.53 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 24.037 | 17.267 | 139% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.22B | 78.1M | 1,567% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.83 | 7.52 | 78% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.71 | 17.20 | 109% |
| Returns for 3 years | 96.06 | 82.20 | 117% |
| Returns for 5 years | 139.10 | 133.60 | 104% |
| Returns for 10 years | 97.02 | 125.95 | 77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement