Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSHNX vs IMLPX
CSHNX vs IMLPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHNX vs. IMLPX commentary
Nov 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHNX is a Hold and IMLPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSHNX has more cash in the bank: 1.04B vs. IMLPX (754M). CSHNX pays higher dividends than IMLPX: CSHNX (7.05) vs IMLPX (4.77). CSHNX was incepted earlier than IMLPX: CSHNX (11 years) vs IMLPX (15 years). IMLPX (11.21) is less costly to investors than CSHNX (1.49). CSHNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. IMLPX (15.31). CSHNX has a lower initial minimum investment than IMLPX: CSHNX (2500) vs IMLPX (1000000). CSHNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.73 vs. IMLPX (-2.90). IMLPX return over 5 years is better than : 204.40 vs. CSHNX (175.07).
| CSHNX | IMLPX | CSHNX / IMLPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 11.21 | 13% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 11.21 | 13% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.881 | 0.915 | 205% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.04B | 754M | 138% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.05 | 4.77 | 148% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.73 | -2.90 | 94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.39 | 59.21 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 175.07 | 204.40 | 86% |
| Returns for 10 years | 67.62 | 106.28 | 64% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement