Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSHNX vs MLXAX
CSHNX vs MLXAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHNX vs. MLXAX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHNX is a Hold and MLXAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSHNX has more cash in the bank: 1.04B vs. MLXAX (337M). CSHNX pays higher dividends than MLXAX: CSHNX (7.05) vs MLXAX (5.72). CSHNX was incepted earlier than MLXAX: CSHNX (11 years) vs MLXAX (11 years). MLXAX (1.73) is less costly to investors than CSHNX (1.49). CSHNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. MLXAX (16.00). MLXAX initial investment is less costly to investors than CSHNX (5%) vs CSHNX (5%). CSHNX (2500) and MLXAX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CSHNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.65 vs. MLXAX (-9.80). CSHNX return over 5 years is better than : 193.62 vs. MLXAX (183.22).
| CSHNX | MLXAX | CSHNX / MLXAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.68 | 89% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.73 | 86% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.159 | -8.028 | -27% |
| Front Load | 5% | 6% | 87% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.04B | 337M | 309% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.05 | 5.72 | 123% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.65 | -9.80 | 7% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.98 | 46.44 | 129% |
| Returns for 5 years | 193.62 | 183.22 | 106% |
| Returns for 10 years | 67.73 | 114.65 | 59% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement