Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSHNX vs MLXCX
CSHNX vs MLXCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHNX vs. MLXCX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHNX is a Hold and MLXCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSHNX has more cash in the bank: 1.04B vs. MLXCX (337M). CSHNX pays higher dividends than MLXCX: CSHNX (7.05) vs MLXCX (4.87). CSHNX was incepted earlier than MLXCX: CSHNX (11 years) vs MLXCX (11 years). MLXCX (2.48) is less costly to investors than CSHNX (1.49). CSHNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. MLXCX (16.00). CSHNX (2500) and MLXCX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CSHNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.82 vs. MLXCX (-11.37). CSHNX return over 5 years is better than : 195.35 vs. MLXCX (174.88).
| CSHNX | MLXCX | CSHNX / MLXCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 2.43 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 2.48 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.066 | -8.471 | -24% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.04B | 337M | 310% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.05 | 4.87 | 145% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.82 | -11.37 | 16% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.84 | 43.46 | 138% |
| Returns for 5 years | 195.35 | 174.88 | 112% |
| Returns for 10 years | 67.58 | 99.96 | 68% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement