Ad is loading...
CSHNX vs PRPAX
CSHNX vs PRPAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHNX vs. PRPAX commentary
May 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHNX is a Buy and PRPAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSHNX has more cash in the bank: 1.06B vs. PRPAX (503M). PRPAX pays higher dividends than CSHNX: PRPAX (56.38) vs CSHNX (6.94). CSHNX was incepted earlier than PRPAX: CSHNX (11 years) vs PRPAX (11 years). PRPAX (1.51) and CSHNX (1.49) have similar cost to investors . PRPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. CSHNX (25.00). PRPAX initial investment is less costly to investors than CSHNX (5%) vs CSHNX (5%). PRPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSHNX: PRPAX (1000) vs CSHNX (2500). CSHNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.49 vs. PRPAX (16.91). CSHNX return over 5 years is better than : 180.80 vs. PRPAX (158.07).
| CSHNX | PRPAX | CSHNX / PRPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.46 | 102% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.51 | 99% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.306 | 0.119 | -1,094% |
| Front Load | 5% | 6% | 91% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.06B | 503M | 210% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.94 | 56.38 | 12% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.49 | 16.91 | 127% |
| Returns for 3 years | 72.86 | 51.28 | 142% |
| Returns for 5 years | 180.80 | 158.07 | 114% |
| Returns for 10 years | 17.01 | 29.69 | 57% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers