Ad is loading...
CSHNX vs PRPAX
CSHNX vs PRPAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHNX vs. PRPAX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHNX is a Buy and PRPAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSHNX has more cash in the bank: 1.15B vs. PRPAX (544M). PRPAX pays higher dividends than CSHNX: PRPAX (52.96) vs CSHNX (6.39). CSHNX was incepted earlier than PRPAX: CSHNX (11 years) vs PRPAX (11 years). PRPAX (1.51) and CSHNX (1.48) have similar cost to investors . PRPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. CSHNX (25.00). PRPAX initial investment is less costly to investors than CSHNX (5%) vs CSHNX (5%). PRPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSHNX: PRPAX (1000) vs CSHNX (2500). CSHNX (25.49) and PRPAX (24.77) have marching annual gain over last year. CSHNX return over 5 years is better than : 296.69 vs. PRPAX (256.28).
| CSHNX | PRPAX | CSHNX / PRPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 1.46 | 101% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 1.51 | 98% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.701 | 7.542 | 23% |
| Front Load | 5% | 6% | 91% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.15B | 544M | 211% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.39 | 52.96 | 12% |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.49 | 24.77 | 103% |
| Returns for 3 years | 67.35 | 55.11 | 122% |
| Returns for 5 years | 296.69 | 256.28 | 116% |
| Returns for 10 years | 22.61 | 42.53 | 53% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers