Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSHNX vs RMLPX
CSHNX vs RMLPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHNX vs. RMLPX commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHNX is a Hold and RMLPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMLPX has more cash in the bank: 1.18B vs. CSHNX (1.09B). CSHNX pays higher dividends than RMLPX: CSHNX (6.64) vs RMLPX (5.04). CSHNX was incepted earlier than RMLPX: CSHNX (11 years) vs RMLPX (8 years). CSHNX (1.49) is less costly to investors than RMLPX (1.10). CSHNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. RMLPX (15.00). CSHNX (2500) and RMLPX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CSHNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.86 vs. RMLPX (9.93). RMLPX return over 5 years is better than : 243.26 vs. CSHNX (203.25).
| CSHNX | RMLPX | CSHNX / RMLPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.10 | 135% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.10 | 135% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.464 | 6.475 | 38% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.09B | 1.18B | 93% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.64 | 5.04 | 132% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.86 | 9.93 | 150% |
| Returns for 3 years | 68.77 | 62.33 | 110% |
| Returns for 5 years | 203.25 | 243.26 | 84% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.70 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement