Ad is loading...
CSHNX vs SMAPX
CSHNX vs SMAPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHNX vs. SMAPX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHNX is a Buy and SMAPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMAPX has more cash in the bank: 1.35B vs. CSHNX (1.15B). CSHNX pays higher dividends than SMAPX: CSHNX (6.39) vs SMAPX (4.02). CSHNX was incepted earlier than SMAPX: CSHNX (11 years) vs SMAPX (12 years). CSHNX (1.48) is less costly to investors than SMAPX (1.40). SMAPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. CSHNX (25.00). CSHNX initial investment is less costly to investors than SMAPX (4%) vs SMAPX (4%). SMAPX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSHNX: SMAPX (1000) vs CSHNX (2500). SMAPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 31.86 vs. CSHNX (25.49). CSHNX return over 5 years is better than : 296.69 vs. SMAPX (259.70).
| CSHNX | SMAPX | CSHNX / SMAPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 1.40 | 106% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 1.40 | 106% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.701 | 8.050 | 21% |
| Front Load | 5% | 4% | 125% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.15B | 1.35B | 85% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.39 | 4.02 | 159% |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.49 | 31.86 | 80% |
| Returns for 3 years | 67.35 | 62.92 | 107% |
| Returns for 5 years | 296.69 | 259.70 | 114% |
| Returns for 10 years | 22.61 | 39.22 | 58% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...