Ad is loading...
CSHNX vs SMAPX
CSHNX vs SMAPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHNX vs. SMAPX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHNX is a Buy and SMAPX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMAPX has more cash in the bank: 1.31B vs. CSHNX (1.13B). CSHNX pays higher dividends than SMAPX: CSHNX (7.86) vs SMAPX (5.39). CSHNX was incepted earlier than SMAPX: CSHNX (11 years) vs SMAPX (12 years). SMAPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 91.00 vs. CSHNX (20.00). SMAPX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSHNX: SMAPX (1000) vs CSHNX (2500). CSHNX (40.11) and SMAPX (38.39) have marching annual gain over last year. SMAPX return over 5 years is better than : 100.44 vs. CSHNX (91.96).
| CSHNX | SMAPX | CSHNX / SMAPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.867 | 4.335 | 89% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.13B | 1.31B | 86% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.86 | 5.39 | 146% |
| Returns for 1 year | 40.11 | 38.39 | 104% |
| Returns for 3 years | 97.65 | 85.46 | 114% |
| Returns for 5 years | 91.96 | 100.44 | 92% |
| Returns for 10 years | 23.86 | 35.14 | 68% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers