Ad is loading...
CSHNX vs SMAPX
CSHNX vs SMAPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHNX vs. SMAPX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHNX is a Hold and SMAPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMAPX has more cash in the bank: 1.33B vs. CSHNX (1.17B). CSHNX pays higher dividends than SMAPX: CSHNX (7.86) vs SMAPX (5.39). CSHNX was incepted earlier than SMAPX: CSHNX (11 years) vs SMAPX (12 years). SMAPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 91.00 vs. CSHNX (20.00). SMAPX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSHNX: SMAPX (1000) vs CSHNX (2500). CSHNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 57.33 vs. SMAPX (53.33). SMAPX return over 5 years is better than : 99.85 vs. CSHNX (85.63).
| CSHNX | SMAPX | CSHNX / SMAPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.545 | 9.197 | 104% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.17B | 1.33B | 87% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.86 | 5.39 | 146% |
| Returns for 1 year | 57.33 | 53.33 | 107% |
| Returns for 3 years | 104.90 | 89.45 | 117% |
| Returns for 5 years | 85.63 | 99.85 | 86% |
| Returns for 10 years | 34.46 | 52.09 | 66% |