Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSHNX vs SMAPX
CSHNX vs SMAPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHNX vs. SMAPX commentary
Oct 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHNX is a Hold and SMAPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMAPX has more cash in the bank: 1.22B vs. CSHNX (1.02B). CSHNX pays higher dividends than SMAPX: CSHNX (6.67) vs SMAPX (4.06). CSHNX was incepted earlier than SMAPX: CSHNX (11 years) vs SMAPX (13 years). CSHNX (1.49) is less costly to investors than SMAPX (1.40). SMAPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. CSHNX (25.00). CSHNX initial investment is less costly to investors than SMAPX (4%) vs SMAPX (4%). SMAPX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSHNX: SMAPX (1000) vs CSHNX (2500). SMAPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.52 vs. CSHNX (5.44). CSHNX return over 5 years is better than : 210.02 vs. SMAPX (170.54).
| CSHNX | SMAPX | CSHNX / SMAPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.37 | 109% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.40 | 106% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.107 | 1.342 | -83% |
| Front Load | 5% | 4% | 125% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.02B | 1.22B | 84% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.67 | 4.06 | 164% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.44 | 6.52 | 83% |
| Returns for 3 years | 66.10 | 62.02 | 107% |
| Returns for 5 years | 210.02 | 170.54 | 123% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.83 | 69.65 | 60% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement