Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSHNX vs SMAPX
CSHNX vs SMAPX Comparison
Open Charts CSHNX vs SMAPX
CSHNX vs SMAPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHNX vs. SMAPX commentary
Sep 09, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHNX is a Hold and SMAPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMAPX has more cash in the bank: 1.43B vs. CSHNX (1.29B). CSHNX pays higher dividends than SMAPX: CSHNX (5.44) vs SMAPX (3.41). CSHNX was incepted earlier than SMAPX: CSHNX (12 years) vs SMAPX (14 years). CSHNX (1.46) is less costly to investors than SMAPX (1.36). SMAPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. CSHNX (31.00). CSHNX initial investment is less costly to investors than SMAPX (4%) vs SMAPX (4%). SMAPX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSHNX: SMAPX (1000) vs CSHNX (2500). CSHNX (28.75) and SMAPX (28.34) have marching annual gain over last year. CSHNX return over 5 years is better than : 176.96 vs. SMAPX (146.04).
| CSHNX | SMAPX | CSHNX / SMAPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 1.32 | 111% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 1.36 | 107% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 33.407 | 25.168 | 133% |
| Front Load | 5% | 4% | 125% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.29B | 1.43B | 90% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.44 | 3.41 | 160% |
| Returns for 1 year | 28.75 | 28.34 | 101% |
| Returns for 3 years | 94.39 | 90.82 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 176.96 | 146.04 | 121% |
| Returns for 10 years | 99.72 | 131.72 | 76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement