Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSHNX vs SMAPX
CSHNX vs SMAPX Comparison
Open Charts CSHNX vs SMAPX
CSHNX vs SMAPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHNX vs. SMAPX commentary
Jun 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHNX is a StrongBuy and SMAPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMAPX has more cash in the bank: 1.41B vs. CSHNX (1.23B). CSHNX pays higher dividends than SMAPX: CSHNX (5.83) vs SMAPX (3.59). CSHNX was incepted earlier than SMAPX: CSHNX (12 years) vs SMAPX (13 years). CSHNX (1.46) is less costly to investors than SMAPX (1.36). SMAPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. CSHNX (31.00). CSHNX initial investment is less costly to investors than SMAPX (4%) vs SMAPX (4%). SMAPX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSHNX: SMAPX (1000) vs CSHNX (2500). SMAPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.82 vs. CSHNX (16.37). CSHNX return over 5 years is better than : 135.09 vs. SMAPX (117.11).
| CSHNX | SMAPX | CSHNX / SMAPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 1.32 | 111% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 1.36 | 107% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.863 | 21.661 | 106% |
| Front Load | 5% | 4% | 125% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.23B | 1.41B | 87% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.83 | 3.59 | 163% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.37 | 22.82 | 72% |
| Returns for 3 years | 91.59 | 91.68 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | 135.09 | 117.11 | 115% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.17 | 154.70 | 61% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement