Ad is loading...
CSHNX vs SMFPX
CSHNX vs SMFPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHNX vs. SMFPX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHNX is a Buy and SMFPX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMFPX has more cash in the bank: 1.23B vs. CSHNX (1.05B). CSHNX pays higher dividends than SMFPX: CSHNX (6.94) vs SMFPX (3.64). CSHNX was incepted earlier than SMFPX: CSHNX (11 years) vs SMFPX (12 years). SMFPX (2.15) is less costly to investors than CSHNX (1.49). SMFPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. CSHNX (25.00). SMFPX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSHNX: SMFPX (1000) vs CSHNX (2500). CSHNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.50 vs. SMFPX (18.63). CSHNX return over 5 years is better than : 180.80 vs. SMFPX (149.01).
| CSHNX | SMFPX | CSHNX / SMFPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 2.12 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 2.15 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.306 | -1.124 | 116% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.05B | 1.23B | 86% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.94 | 3.64 | 191% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.50 | 18.63 | 121% |
| Returns for 3 years | 72.22 | 55.77 | 130% |
| Returns for 5 years | 180.80 | 149.01 | 121% |
| Returns for 10 years | 17.06 | 16.78 | 102% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...