Ad is loading...
CSHNX vs SMFPX
CSHNX vs SMFPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHNX vs. SMFPX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHNX is a Hold and SMFPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMFPX has more cash in the bank: 1.33B vs. CSHNX (1.17B). CSHNX pays higher dividends than SMFPX: CSHNX (7.86) vs SMFPX (4.75). CSHNX was incepted earlier than SMFPX: CSHNX (11 years) vs SMFPX (12 years). SMFPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 91.00 vs. CSHNX (20.00). SMFPX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSHNX: SMFPX (1000) vs CSHNX (2500). CSHNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 57.33 vs. SMFPX (52.07). SMFPX return over 5 years is better than : 92.29 vs. CSHNX (85.63).
| CSHNX | SMFPX | CSHNX / SMFPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.545 | 9.047 | 106% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.17B | 1.33B | 87% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.86 | 4.75 | 165% |
| Returns for 1 year | 57.33 | 52.07 | 110% |
| Returns for 3 years | 104.90 | 85.17 | 123% |
| Returns for 5 years | 85.63 | 92.29 | 93% |
| Returns for 10 years | 34.46 | 40.66 | 85% |