Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSHNX vs SMFPX
CSHNX vs SMFPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHNX vs. SMFPX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHNX is a Hold and SMFPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMFPX has more cash in the bank: 1.23B vs. CSHNX (1.04B). CSHNX pays higher dividends than SMFPX: CSHNX (7.05) vs SMFPX (3.55). CSHNX was incepted earlier than SMFPX: CSHNX (11 years) vs SMFPX (13 years). SMFPX (2.15) is less costly to investors than CSHNX (1.49). SMFPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. CSHNX (25.00). SMFPX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSHNX: SMFPX (1000) vs CSHNX (2500). SMFPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.71 vs. CSHNX (-0.65). CSHNX return over 5 years is better than : 193.62 vs. SMFPX (142.73).
| CSHNX | SMFPX | CSHNX / SMFPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 2.12 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 2.15 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.159 | 3.154 | 68% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.04B | 1.23B | 85% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.05 | 3.55 | 199% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.65 | 0.71 | -93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.98 | 52.05 | 115% |
| Returns for 5 years | 193.62 | 142.73 | 136% |
| Returns for 10 years | 67.73 | 95.65 | 71% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement