Ad is loading...
CSHNX vs SMFPX
CSHNX vs SMFPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHNX vs. SMFPX commentary
Dec 19, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHNX is a Hold and SMFPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMFPX has more cash in the bank: 1.21B vs. CSHNX (1.04B). CSHNX pays higher dividends than SMFPX: CSHNX (7.86) vs SMFPX (4.75). CSHNX was incepted earlier than SMFPX: CSHNX (10 years) vs SMFPX (12 years). SMFPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 91.00 vs. CSHNX (20.00). SMFPX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSHNX: SMFPX (1000) vs CSHNX (2500). CSHNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 41.62 vs. SMFPX (37.02). SMFPX return over 5 years is better than : 80.93 vs. CSHNX (74.95).
| CSHNX | SMFPX | CSHNX / SMFPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 40.286 | 35.105 | 115% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.04B | 1.21B | 86% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.86 | 4.75 | 165% |
| Returns for 1 year | 41.62 | 37.02 | 112% |
| Returns for 3 years | 106.71 | 81.97 | 130% |
| Returns for 5 years | 74.95 | 80.93 | 93% |
| Returns for 10 years | 19.61 | 22.14 | 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...