Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSHNX vs SMFPX
CSHNX vs SMFPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHNX vs. SMFPX commentary
Jul 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHNX is a Buy and SMFPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMFPX has more cash in the bank: 1.28B vs. CSHNX (1.1B). CSHNX pays higher dividends than SMFPX: CSHNX (6.57) vs SMFPX (3.39). CSHNX was incepted earlier than SMFPX: CSHNX (11 years) vs SMFPX (12 years). SMFPX (2.15) is less costly to investors than CSHNX (1.49). SMFPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. CSHNX (25.00). SMFPX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSHNX: SMFPX (1000) vs CSHNX (2500). CSHNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.75 vs. SMFPX (17.69). CSHNX return over 5 years is better than : 191.50 vs. SMFPX (152.43).
| CSHNX | SMFPX | CSHNX / SMFPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 2.12 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 2.15 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.146 | 3.292 | 96% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.1B | 1.28B | 86% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.57 | 3.39 | 194% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.75 | 17.69 | 117% |
| Returns for 3 years | 88.29 | 73.86 | 120% |
| Returns for 5 years | 191.50 | 152.43 | 126% |
| Returns for 10 years | 28.63 | 31.78 | 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement