Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSHNX vs SMLPX
CSHNX vs SMLPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHNX vs. SMLPX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHNX is a Hold and SMLPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMLPX has more cash in the bank: 1.28B vs. CSHNX (1.08B). CSHNX pays higher dividends than SMLPX: CSHNX (6.61) vs SMLPX (4.37). CSHNX was incepted earlier than SMLPX: CSHNX (11 years) vs SMLPX (13 years). CSHNX (1.49) is less costly to investors than SMLPX (1.12). SMLPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. CSHNX (25.00). CSHNX has a lower initial minimum investment than SMLPX: CSHNX (2500) vs SMLPX (100000). SMLPX (17.62) and CSHNX (16.82) have marching annual gain over last year. CSHNX return over 5 years is better than : 171.90 vs. SMLPX (149.42).
| CSHNX | SMLPX | CSHNX / SMLPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.09 | 137% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.12 | 133% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.990 | 4.365 | 46% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 100000 | 3% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.08B | 1.28B | 85% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.61 | 4.37 | 151% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.82 | 17.62 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.59 | 58.03 | 110% |
| Returns for 5 years | 171.90 | 149.42 | 115% |
| Returns for 10 years | 33.16 | 63.18 | 52% |