Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSHNX vs SMLPX
CSHNX vs SMLPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHNX vs. SMLPX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHNX is a Hold and SMLPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMLPX has more cash in the bank: 1.24B vs. CSHNX (1.04B). CSHNX pays higher dividends than SMLPX: CSHNX (7.05) vs SMLPX (4.57). CSHNX was incepted earlier than SMLPX: CSHNX (11 years) vs SMLPX (13 years). CSHNX (1.49) is less costly to investors than SMLPX (1.12). SMLPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. CSHNX (25.00). CSHNX has a lower initial minimum investment than SMLPX: CSHNX (2500) vs SMLPX (100000). SMLPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.86 vs. CSHNX (-1.82). CSHNX return over 5 years is better than : 195.35 vs. SMLPX (156.35).
| CSHNX | SMLPX | CSHNX / SMLPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.09 | 137% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.12 | 133% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.066 | 4.102 | 50% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 100000 | 3% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.04B | 1.24B | 84% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.05 | 4.57 | 154% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.82 | 0.86 | -211% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.84 | 56.62 | 106% |
| Returns for 5 years | 195.35 | 156.35 | 125% |
| Returns for 10 years | 67.58 | 116.12 | 58% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement