Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSHNX vs TMCLX
CSHNX vs TMCLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHNX vs. TMCLX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHNX is a Hold and TMCLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSHNX has more cash in the bank: 1.04B vs. TMCLX (123M). CSHNX pays higher dividends than TMCLX: CSHNX (7.05) vs TMCLX (3.20). CSHNX was incepted earlier than TMCLX: CSHNX (11 years) vs TMCLX (13 years). TMCLX (2.35) is less costly to investors than CSHNX (1.49). TMCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 55.00 vs. CSHNX (25.00). TMCLX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSHNX: TMCLX (1000) vs CSHNX (2500). TMCLX (-1.74) and CSHNX (-1.82) have marching annual gain over last year. CSHNX return over 5 years is better than : 195.35 vs. TMCLX (94.67).
| CSHNX | TMCLX | CSHNX / TMCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 2.35 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 2.35 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.066 | 1.932 | 107% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.04B | 123M | 849% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.05 | 3.20 | 220% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.82 | -1.74 | 105% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.84 | 37.57 | 159% |
| Returns for 5 years | 195.35 | 94.67 | 206% |
| Returns for 10 years | 67.58 | 57.06 | 118% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement