Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSHNX vs TMLAX
CSHNX vs TMLAX Comparison
Open Charts CSHNX vs TMLAX
CSHNX vs TMLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHNX vs. TMLAX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHNX is a Hold and TMLAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSHNX has more cash in the bank: 1.29B vs. TMLAX (161M). CSHNX pays higher dividends than TMLAX: CSHNX (5.44) vs TMLAX (3.08). CSHNX was incepted earlier than TMLAX: CSHNX (12 years) vs TMLAX (13 years). TMLAX (1.53) and CSHNX (1.46) have similar cost to investors . TMLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. CSHNX (31.00). TMLAX initial investment is less costly to investors than CSHNX (5%) vs CSHNX (5%). TMLAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSHNX: TMLAX (1000) vs CSHNX (2500). TMLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.18 vs. CSHNX (24.86). CSHNX return over 5 years is better than : 174.80 vs. TMLAX (108.95).
| CSHNX | TMLAX | CSHNX / TMLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 1.53 | 95% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 1.53 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 31.818 | 28.482 | 112% |
| Front Load | 5% | 6% | 91% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.29B | 161M | 798% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.44 | 3.08 | 176% |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.86 | 29.18 | 85% |
| Returns for 3 years | 90.51 | 87.87 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 174.80 | 108.95 | 160% |
| Returns for 10 years | 105.04 | 98.57 | 107% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers