Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSHNX vs TMLAX
CSHNX vs TMLAX Comparison
Open Charts CSHNX vs TMLAX
CSHNX vs TMLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHNX vs. TMLAX commentary
Jun 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHNX is a StrongBuy and TMLAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSHNX has more cash in the bank: 1.22B vs. TMLAX (158M). CSHNX pays higher dividends than TMLAX: CSHNX (5.83) vs TMLAX (3.59). CSHNX was incepted earlier than TMLAX: CSHNX (12 years) vs TMLAX (13 years). TMLAX (1.53) and CSHNX (1.46) have similar cost to investors . TMLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. CSHNX (31.00). TMLAX initial investment is less costly to investors than CSHNX (5%) vs CSHNX (5%). TMLAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSHNX: TMLAX (1000) vs CSHNX (2500). TMLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.33 vs. CSHNX (18.71). CSHNX return over 5 years is better than : 139.10 vs. TMLAX (88.67).
| CSHNX | TMLAX | CSHNX / TMLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 1.53 | 95% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 1.53 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 24.037 | 22.700 | 106% |
| Front Load | 5% | 6% | 91% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.22B | 158M | 775% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.83 | 3.59 | 163% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.71 | 24.33 | 77% |
| Returns for 3 years | 96.06 | 87.33 | 110% |
| Returns for 5 years | 139.10 | 88.67 | 157% |
| Returns for 10 years | 97.02 | 100.53 | 97% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement