Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSHNX vs TMLPX
CSHNX vs TMLPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHNX vs. TMLPX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHNX is a Hold and TMLPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSHNX has more cash in the bank: 1.04B vs. TMLPX (123M). CSHNX pays higher dividends than TMLPX: CSHNX (7.05) vs TMLPX (4.35). CSHNX was incepted earlier than TMLPX: CSHNX (11 years) vs TMLPX (13 years). CSHNX (1.49) is less costly to investors than TMLPX (1.28). TMLPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 55.00 vs. CSHNX (25.00). CSHNX has a lower initial minimum investment than TMLPX: CSHNX (2500) vs TMLPX (1000000). TMLPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.45 vs. CSHNX (-0.65). CSHNX return over 5 years is better than : 193.62 vs. TMLPX (103.10).
| CSHNX | TMLPX | CSHNX / TMLPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.28 | 116% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.28 | 116% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.159 | 3.002 | 72% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.04B | 123M | 848% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.05 | 4.35 | 162% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.65 | 0.45 | -146% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.98 | 41.94 | 143% |
| Returns for 5 years | 193.62 | 103.10 | 188% |
| Returns for 10 years | 67.73 | 67.33 | 101% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement