Ad is loading...
CSHNX vs VLPCX
CSHNX vs VLPCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHNX vs. VLPCX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHNX is a Hold and VLPCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSHNX has more cash in the bank: 969M vs. VLPCX (52.8M). CSHNX pays higher dividends than VLPCX: CSHNX (6.39) vs VLPCX (1.85). CSHNX was incepted earlier than VLPCX: CSHNX (11 years) vs VLPCX (10 years). VLPCX (2.51) is less costly to investors than CSHNX (1.48). VLPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. CSHNX (25.00). CSHNX (2500) and VLPCX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CSHNX (12.57) and VLPCX (12.16) have marching annual gain over last year. VLPCX return over 5 years is better than : 261.00 vs. CSHNX (215.51).
| CSHNX | VLPCX | CSHNX / VLPCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 2.15 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 2.51 | 59% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -9.421 | -10.266 | 92% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 969M | 52.8M | 1,835% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.39 | 1.85 | 344% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.57 | 12.16 | 103% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.03 | 41.86 | 115% |
| Returns for 5 years | 215.51 | 261.00 | 83% |
| Returns for 10 years | 8.17 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...