Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSHNX vs VLPCX
CSHNX vs VLPCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHNX vs. VLPCX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHNX is a Hold and VLPCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSHNX has more cash in the bank: 1.04B vs. VLPCX (44.5M). CSHNX pays higher dividends than VLPCX: CSHNX (7.05) vs VLPCX (1.34). CSHNX was incepted earlier than VLPCX: CSHNX (11 years) vs VLPCX (10 years). VLPCX (2.51) is less costly to investors than CSHNX (1.49). VLPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. CSHNX (25.00). CSHNX (2500) and VLPCX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CSHNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.82 vs. VLPCX (-3.14). VLPCX (204.53) and CSHNX (195.35) have equivalent 5 years return.
| CSHNX | VLPCX | CSHNX / VLPCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 2.15 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 2.51 | 59% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.066 | 0.658 | 314% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.04B | 44.5M | 2,346% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.05 | 1.34 | 526% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.82 | -3.14 | 58% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.84 | 49.52 | 121% |
| Returns for 5 years | 195.35 | 204.53 | 96% |
| Returns for 10 years | 67.58 | 130.02 | 52% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement