Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSHNX vs VLPCX
CSHNX vs VLPCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHNX vs. VLPCX commentary
Oct 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHNX is a Hold and VLPCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSHNX has more cash in the bank: 1.07B vs. VLPCX (47.2M). CSHNX pays higher dividends than VLPCX: CSHNX (6.67) vs VLPCX (1.85). CSHNX was incepted earlier than VLPCX: CSHNX (11 years) vs VLPCX (10 years). VLPCX (2.51) is less costly to investors than CSHNX (1.49). VLPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. CSHNX (25.00). CSHNX (2500) and VLPCX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. VLPCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.47 vs. CSHNX (8.98). VLPCX return over 5 years is better than : 252.22 vs. CSHNX (218.08).
| CSHNX | VLPCX | CSHNX / VLPCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 2.15 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 2.51 | 59% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.653 | 3.131 | 53% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.07B | 47.2M | 2,271% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.67 | 1.85 | 361% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.98 | 10.47 | 86% |
| Returns for 3 years | 77.90 | 67.94 | 115% |
| Returns for 5 years | 218.08 | 252.22 | 86% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.42 | 108.25 | 41% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement