Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSHZX vs MLPFX
CSHZX vs MLPFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHZX vs. MLPFX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHZX is a Hold and MLPFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MLPFX has more cash in the bank: 2B vs. CSHZX (1.04B). CSHZX (6.52) and MLPFX (6.28) have matching dividends . CSHZX was incepted earlier than MLPFX: CSHZX (15 years) vs MLPFX (16 years). MLPFX (10.29) is less costly to investors than CSHZX (1.25). CSHZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. MLPFX (20.00). MLPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSHZX: MLPFX (1000) vs CSHZX (1000000). MLPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.05 vs. CSHZX (-0.45). MLPFX (202.51) and CSHZX (196.85) have equivalent 5 years return.
| CSHZX | MLPFX | CSHZX / MLPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 10.29 | 12% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 10.29 | 12% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.340 | 5.732 | 41% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.04B | 2B | 52% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.52 | 6.28 | 104% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.45 | 5.05 | -9% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.09 | 68.39 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | 196.85 | 202.51 | 97% |
| Returns for 10 years | 72.80 | 113.64 | 64% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement