Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSHZX vs MLPFX
CSHZX vs MLPFX Comparison
Open Charts CSHZX vs MLPFX
CSHZX vs MLPFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHZX vs. MLPFX commentary
Jul 31, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHZX is a Hold and MLPFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MLPFX has more cash in the bank: 2.38B vs. CSHZX (1.24B). CSHZX (5.27) and MLPFX (5.27) have matching dividends . CSHZX was incepted earlier than MLPFX: CSHZX (16 years) vs MLPFX (16 years). MLPFX (1.45) is less costly to investors than CSHZX (1.24). CSHZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. MLPFX (14.00). MLPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSHZX: MLPFX (1000) vs CSHZX (1000000). MLPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.54 vs. CSHZX (20.82). MLPFX (174.61) and CSHZX (166.78) have equivalent 5 years return.
| CSHZX | MLPFX | CSHZX / MLPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 1.44 | 86% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 1.45 | 86% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 26.347 | 24.212 | 109% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.24B | 2.38B | 52% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.27 | 5.27 | 100% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.82 | 27.54 | 76% |
| Returns for 3 years | 87.40 | 93.15 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 166.78 | 174.61 | 96% |
| Returns for 10 years | 97.77 | 154.85 | 63% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement