Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSIBX vs PDBAX
CSIBX vs PDBAX Comparison
Open Charts CSIBX vs PDBAX
CSIBX vs PDBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSIBX vs. PDBAX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSIBX is a Hold and PDBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PDBAX has more cash in the bank: 53.5B vs. CSIBX (4.17B). CSIBX (4.31) and PDBAX (4.29) have matching dividends . CSIBX was incepted earlier than PDBAX: CSIBX (39 years) vs PDBAX (31 years). PDBAX (0.76) and CSIBX (0.75) have similar cost to investors . CSIBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 326.00 vs. PDBAX (91.00). CSIBX (3%) and PDBAX (3%) have equivalent initial investment costs. CSIBX (1000) and PDBAX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. PDBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.95 vs. CSIBX (5.22). CSIBX return over 5 years is better than : 3.39 vs. PDBAX (0.85).
| CSIBX | PDBAX | CSIBX / PDBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 0.75 | 97% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.76 | 99% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.230 | 0.522 | 44% |
| Front Load | 3% | 3% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.17B | 53.5B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.31 | 4.29 | 100% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.22 | 5.95 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.51 | 16.02 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.39 | 0.85 | 398% |
| Returns for 10 years | 21.62 | 17.63 | 123% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement