Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSIEX vs GFACX
CSIEX vs GFACX Comparison
Open Charts CSIEX vs GFACX
CSIEX vs GFACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSIEX vs. GFACX commentary
Sep 08, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSIEX is a Buy and GFACX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 342B vs. CSIEX (3.41B). CSIEX pays higher dividends than GFACX: CSIEX (0.18) vs GFACX (0.00). CSIEX was incepted earlier than GFACX: CSIEX (39 years) vs GFACX (26 years). GFACX (1.35) is less costly to investors than CSIEX (0.91). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. CSIEX (14.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSIEX: GFACX (250) vs CSIEX (1000). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.72 vs. CSIEX (-20.83). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 3.78 vs. CSIEX (-20.40).
| CSIEX | GFACX | CSIEX / GFACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.35 | 67% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.35 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.167 | 9.673 | -33% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.41B | 342B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.18 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -20.83 | 0.72 | -2,880% |
| Returns for 3 years | -11.34 | 35.31 | -32% |
| Returns for 5 years | -20.40 | 3.78 | -539% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.60 | 79.28 | 70% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement