Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSIEX vs GFACX
CSIEX vs GFACX Comparison
Open Charts CSIEX vs GFACX
CSIEX vs GFACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSIEX vs. GFACX commentary
Jul 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSIEX is a Buy and GFACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. CSIEX (3.35B). CSIEX pays higher dividends than GFACX: CSIEX (0.19) vs GFACX (0.00). CSIEX was incepted earlier than GFACX: CSIEX (39 years) vs GFACX (25 years). GFACX (1.35) is less costly to investors than CSIEX (0.91). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. CSIEX (14.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSIEX: GFACX (250) vs CSIEX (1000). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.45 vs. CSIEX (-23.21). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 6.24 vs. CSIEX (-17.95).
| CSIEX | GFACX | CSIEX / GFACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.35 | 67% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.35 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.740 | 7.489 | -90% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.35B | 361B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.19 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -23.21 | 3.45 | -673% |
| Returns for 3 years | -13.23 | 35.09 | -38% |
| Returns for 5 years | -17.95 | 6.24 | -288% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.79 | 85.53 | 65% |