Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSIEX vs GFACX
CSIEX vs GFACX Comparison
Open Charts CSIEX vs GFACX
CSIEX vs GFACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSIEX vs. GFACX commentary
Jun 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSIEX is a Hold and GFACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. CSIEX (3.53B). CSIEX pays higher dividends than GFACX: CSIEX (0.19) vs GFACX (0.00). CSIEX was incepted earlier than GFACX: CSIEX (39 years) vs GFACX (25 years). GFACX (1.35) is less costly to investors than CSIEX (0.91). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. CSIEX (14.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSIEX: GFACX (250) vs CSIEX (1000). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.82 vs. CSIEX (-25.01). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 8.45 vs. CSIEX (-17.16).
| CSIEX | GFACX | CSIEX / GFACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.35 | 67% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.35 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -9.382 | 6.241 | -150% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.53B | 361B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.19 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -25.01 | 5.82 | -430% |
| Returns for 3 years | -13.68 | 36.16 | -38% |
| Returns for 5 years | -17.16 | 8.45 | -203% |
| Returns for 10 years | 51.12 | 84.56 | 60% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement