Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSIFX vs RLBAX
CSIFX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts CSIFX vs RLBAX
CSIFX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSIFX vs. RLBAX commentary
Jul 26, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSIFX is a Buy and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. CSIFX (1.47B). CSIFX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: CSIFX (1.29) vs RLBAX (1.11). CSIFX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: CSIFX (44 years) vs RLBAX (24 years). RLBAX (1.32) is less costly to investors than CSIFX (0.90). CSIFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 164.00 vs. RLBAX (50.00). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSIFX: RLBAX (250) vs CSIFX (1000). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.52 vs. CSIFX (4.08). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 27.62 vs. CSIFX (19.56).
| CSIFX | RLBAX | CSIFX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.32 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.32 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.454 | 7.341 | 33% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.47B | 288B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.29 | 1.11 | 116% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.08 | 9.52 | 43% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.78 | 34.60 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.56 | 27.62 | 71% |
| Returns for 10 years | 78.86 | 71.38 | 110% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement