Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSIFX vs RLBFX
CSIFX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts CSIFX vs RLBFX
Calvert Balanced A
Price$47.30
Change+$0.30 (+0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.43B
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$37.65
Change+$0.12 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets256.45B
CSIFX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSIFX vs. RLBFX commentary
Sep 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSIFX is a Buy and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 256B vs. CSIFX (1.43B). RLBFX pays higher dividends than CSIFX: RLBFX (2.05) vs CSIFX (1.29). CSIFX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: CSIFX (43 years) vs RLBFX (23 years). CSIFX (0.90) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). CSIFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 153.00 vs. RLBFX (44.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSIFX: RLBFX (250) vs CSIFX (1000). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.79 vs. CSIFX (6.78). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 39.86 vs. CSIFX (34.41).
| CSIFX | RLBFX | CSIFX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.29 | 310% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.29 | 310% |
| Fund Existence | 43 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.549 | 10.302 | 64% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.43B | 256B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.29 | 2.05 | 63% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.78 | 8.79 | 77% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.83 | 38.41 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.41 | 39.86 | 86% |
| Returns for 10 years | 67.40 | 79.00 | 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement