Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSIFX vs RLBFX
CSIFX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts CSIFX vs RLBFX
CSIFX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSIFX vs. RLBFX commentary
Jun 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSIFX is a Buy and RLBFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. CSIFX (1.49B). RLBFX pays higher dividends than CSIFX: RLBFX (2.02) vs CSIFX (1.28). CSIFX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: CSIFX (44 years) vs RLBFX (24 years). CSIFX (0.90) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.30). CSIFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 164.00 vs. RLBFX (50.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSIFX: RLBFX (250) vs CSIFX (1000). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.25 vs. CSIFX (8.17). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 35.01 vs. CSIFX (23.47).
| CSIFX | RLBFX | CSIFX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.30 | 300% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.30 | 300% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.810 | 8.802 | 32% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.49B | 288B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.28 | 2.02 | 63% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.17 | 15.25 | 54% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.72 | 43.97 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.47 | 35.01 | 67% |
| Returns for 10 years | 85.19 | 88.96 | 96% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers