Advertisement
CSIQ vs ENPH
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSIQ is a StrongBuy and ENPH is a Buy.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CSIQ’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ENPH’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CSIQ’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
- ENPH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
| CSIQ | ENPH | CSIQ / ENPH | |
| Capitalization | 1.27B | 16.4B | 8% |
| EBITDA | 637M | 597M | 107% |
| Gain YTD | -4.586 | -44.118 | 10% |
| P/E Ratio | 3.95 | 38.38 | 10% |
| Revenue | 7.88B | 2.29B | 344% |
| Total Cash | 1.92B | 1.7B | 113% |
| Total Debt | 4.54B | 1.3B | 349% |
CSIQ | ENPH | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 13 | 7 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 50 Fair valued | 50 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 60 | 65 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 3 | 87 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 26 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CSIQ's Valuation (50) in the Electrical Products industry is in the same range as ENPH (50) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that CSIQ’s stock grew similarly to ENPH’s over the last 12 months.
CSIQ's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Electrical Products industry is in the same range as ENPH (100) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that CSIQ’s stock grew similarly to ENPH’s over the last 12 months.
CSIQ's SMR Rating (100) in the Electrical Products industry is in the same range as ENPH (100) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that CSIQ’s stock grew similarly to ENPH’s over the last 12 months.
CSIQ's Price Growth Rating (60) in the Electrical Products industry is in the same range as ENPH (65) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that CSIQ’s stock grew similarly to ENPH’s over the last 12 months.
CSIQ's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the Electrical Products industry is significantly better than the same rating for ENPH (87) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that CSIQ’s stock grew significantly faster than ENPH’s over the last 12 months.
| CSIQ | ENPH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 77% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 10 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 85% | 20 days ago 88% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 82% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| BUFIX | 23.77 | 0.39 | +1.67% |
| Buffalo International | |||
| BDBPX | 23.71 | 0.31 | +1.32% |
| iShares Russell 2000 Small-Cap Idx Inv P | |||
| VTCIX | 155.52 | 1.73 | +1.12% |
| Vanguard Tax-Managed Capital App I | |||
| GIUIX | 37.18 | 0.35 | +0.95% |
| NAA Mid Growth Institutional | |||
| CSAZX | 14.52 | 0.13 | +0.90% |
| Columbia Global Opportunities Inst | |||
CSIQ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CSIQ has been loosely correlated with JKS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CSIQ jumps, then JKS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CSIQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CSIQ | 100% | +4.74% | ||
| JKS - CSIQ | 66% Loosely correlated | +1.29% | ||
| RUN - CSIQ | 60% Loosely correlated | +15.38% | ||
| ENPH - CSIQ | 54% Loosely correlated | +11.05% | ||
| FCEL - CSIQ | 54% Loosely correlated | +0.85% | ||
| SEDG - CSIQ | 54% Loosely correlated | +17.87% | ||
More | ||||
ENPH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ENPH has been closely correlated with SEDG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ENPH jumps, then SEDG could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ENPH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ENPH | 100% | +11.05% | ||
| SEDG - ENPH | 78% Closely correlated | +17.87% | ||
| RUN - ENPH | 71% Closely correlated | +15.38% | ||
| FSLR - ENPH | 63% Loosely correlated | +4.50% | ||
| CSIQ - ENPH | 59% Loosely correlated | +4.74% | ||
| FCEL - ENPH | 56% Loosely correlated | +0.85% | ||
More | ||||