CSL
Price
$384.39
Change
+$18.03 (+4.92%)
Updated
Aug 12 closing price
Capitalization
16.43B
71 days until earnings call
FBIN
Price
$57.29
Change
+$2.16 (+3.92%)
Updated
Aug 12, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
6.87B
71 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CSL vs FBIN

Header iconCSL vs FBIN Comparison
Open Charts CSL vs FBINBanner chart's image
Carlisle Companies
Price$384.39
Change+$18.03 (+4.92%)
Volume$490.68K
Capitalization16.43B
Fortune Brands Innovations
Price$57.29
Change+$2.16 (+3.92%)
Volume$18.49K
Capitalization6.87B
CSL vs FBIN Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CSL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FBIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CSL vs. FBIN commentary
Aug 13, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSL is a Buy and FBIN is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 13, 2025
Stock price -- (CSL: $384.39 vs. FBIN: $57.27)
Brand notoriety: CSL and FBIN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Building Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CSL: 99% vs. FBIN: 90%
Market capitalization -- CSL: $16.43B vs. FBIN: $6.87B
CSL [@Building Products] is valued at $16.43B. FBIN’s [@Building Products] market capitalization is $6.87B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Building Products] industry ranges from $97.67B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Building Products] industry is $11.53B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CSL’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFBIN’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CSL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FBIN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CSL is a better buy in the long-term than FBIN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CSL’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FBIN’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CSL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FBIN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CSL is a better buy in the short-term than FBIN.

Price Growth

CSL (@Building Products) experienced а +6.40% price change this week, while FBIN (@Building Products) price change was +1.78% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Building Products industry was +1.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.75%.

Reported Earning Dates

CSL is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

FBIN is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Building Products (+1.12% weekly)

The industry manufactures products used in the construction of residential and commercial buildings. The process involves using materials and other products, and processing them to create finished items such as doors, windows, light fittings, floor coverings, climate control products and other building components and home improvement products. Masco Corporation, Allegion PLC and Lennox International Inc. are major manufacturers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSL($16.4B) has a higher market cap than FBIN($6.88B). CSL has higher P/E ratio than FBIN: CSL (21.52) vs FBIN (18.07). CSL YTD gains are higher at: 4.764 vs. FBIN (-18.609). CSL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.28B vs. FBIN (839M). FBIN has more cash in the bank: 235M vs. CSL (68.4M). CSL has less debt than FBIN: CSL (1.89B) vs FBIN (3B). CSL has higher revenues than FBIN: CSL (5B) vs FBIN (4.5B).
CSLFBINCSL / FBIN
Capitalization16.4B6.88B239%
EBITDA1.28B839M152%
Gain YTD4.764-18.609-26%
P/E Ratio21.5218.07119%
Revenue5B4.5B111%
Total Cash68.4M235M29%
Total Debt1.89B3B63%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CSL vs FBIN: Fundamental Ratings
CSL
FBIN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6411
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
71
Overvalued
67
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2797
SMR RATING
1..100
3151
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6262
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5473
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
6550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FBIN's Valuation (67) in the Building Products industry is in the same range as CSL (71) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry. This means that FBIN’s stock grew similarly to CSL’s over the last 12 months.

CSL's Profit vs Risk Rating (27) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry is significantly better than the same rating for FBIN (97) in the Building Products industry. This means that CSL’s stock grew significantly faster than FBIN’s over the last 12 months.

CSL's SMR Rating (31) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry is in the same range as FBIN (51) in the Building Products industry. This means that CSL’s stock grew similarly to FBIN’s over the last 12 months.

CSL's Price Growth Rating (62) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry is in the same range as FBIN (62) in the Building Products industry. This means that CSL’s stock grew similarly to FBIN’s over the last 12 months.

CSL's P/E Growth Rating (54) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry is in the same range as FBIN (73) in the Building Products industry. This means that CSL’s stock grew similarly to FBIN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CSLFBIN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
46%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
59%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CSL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FBIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JPEF72.100.93
+1.31%
JPMorgan Equity Focus ETF
HYDW47.130.06
+0.13%
Xtrackers Low Beta High Yield Bond ETF
PSDM51.290.05
+0.11%
PGIM Short Duration Mlt-Sect Bd ETF
CGRO27.34N/A
N/A
CoreValues Alpha Greater China Gr ETF
FOPC25.64-0.01
-0.03%
Frontier Asset Opportunistic Credit ETF

CSL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CSL has been loosely correlated with AWI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CSL jumps, then AWI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CSL
1D Price
Change %
CSL100%
+4.92%
AWI - CSL
59%
Loosely correlated
+2.39%
FBIN - CSL
57%
Loosely correlated
+3.88%
WMS - CSL
56%
Loosely correlated
+3.90%
SPXC - CSL
55%
Loosely correlated
-4.66%
TT - CSL
53%
Loosely correlated
+2.54%
More

FBIN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FBIN has been closely correlated with MAS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FBIN jumps, then MAS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FBIN
1D Price
Change %
FBIN100%
-1.64%
MAS - FBIN
86%
Closely correlated
-0.56%
OC - FBIN
75%
Closely correlated
-1.31%
BLDR - FBIN
75%
Closely correlated
-2.60%
TREX - FBIN
71%
Closely correlated
-1.86%
BXC - FBIN
70%
Closely correlated
-1.05%
More