CSL
Price
$454.83
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
84 days until earnings call
FBIN
Price
$75.30
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
76 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CSL vs FBIN

Header iconCSL vs FBIN Comparison
Open Charts CSL vs FBINBanner chart's image
Carlisle Companies
Price$454.83
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$232.67K
CapitalizationN/A
Fortune Brands Innovations
Price$75.30
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.44M
CapitalizationN/A
CSL vs FBIN Comparison Chart
Loading...
CSL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
FBIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CSL vs. FBIN commentary
Nov 15, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSL is a Buy and FBIN is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 15, 2024
Stock price -- (CSL: $450.58 vs. FBIN: $75.04)
Brand notoriety: CSL and FBIN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Building Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CSL: 59% vs. FBIN: 93%
Market capitalization -- CSL: $18.83B vs. FBIN: $10.44B
CSL [@Building Products] is valued at $18.83B. FBIN’s [@Building Products] market capitalization is $10.44B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Building Products] industry ranges from $67.38B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Building Products] industry is $11.76B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CSL’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFBIN’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CSL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FBIN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CSL is a better buy in the long-term than FBIN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CSL’s TA Score shows that 8 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FBIN’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CSL’s TA Score: 8 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • FBIN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CSL is a better buy in the short-term than FBIN.

Price Growth

CSL (@Building Products) experienced а +0.43% price change this week, while FBIN (@Building Products) price change was -5.16% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Building Products industry was -0.67%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.09%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.97%.

Reported Earning Dates

CSL is expected to report earnings on Feb 06, 2025.

FBIN is expected to report earnings on Jan 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Building Products (-0.67% weekly)

The industry manufactures products used in the construction of residential and commercial buildings. The process involves using materials and other products, and processing them to create finished items such as doors, windows, light fittings, floor coverings, climate control products and other building components and home improvement products. Masco Corporation, Allegion PLC and Lennox International Inc. are major manufacturers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSL($18.8B) has a higher market cap than FBIN($10.4B). CSL has higher P/E ratio than FBIN: CSL (27.70) vs FBIN (26.20). CSL YTD gains are higher at: 46.594 vs. FBIN (-0.163). CSL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.21B vs. FBIN (803M). CSL has more cash in the bank: 577M vs. FBIN (366M). CSL has less debt than FBIN: CSL (2.32B) vs FBIN (2.81B). FBIN (4.63B) and CSL (4.59B) have equivalent revenues.
CSLFBINCSL / FBIN
Capitalization18.8B10.4B181%
EBITDA1.21B803M151%
Gain YTD46.594-0.163-28,651%
P/E Ratio27.7026.20106%
Revenue4.59B4.63B99%
Total Cash577M366M158%
Total Debt2.32B2.81B83%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CSL vs FBIN: Fundamental Ratings
CSL
FBIN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1152
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
76
Overvalued
66
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
748
SMR RATING
1..100
2148
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4557
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4151
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
4750

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FBIN's Valuation (66) in the Building Products industry is in the same range as CSL (76) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry. This means that FBIN’s stock grew similarly to CSL’s over the last 12 months.

CSL's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FBIN (48) in the Building Products industry. This means that CSL’s stock grew somewhat faster than FBIN’s over the last 12 months.

CSL's SMR Rating (21) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry is in the same range as FBIN (48) in the Building Products industry. This means that CSL’s stock grew similarly to FBIN’s over the last 12 months.

CSL's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry is in the same range as FBIN (57) in the Building Products industry. This means that CSL’s stock grew similarly to FBIN’s over the last 12 months.

CSL's P/E Growth Rating (41) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry is in the same range as FBIN (51) in the Building Products industry. This means that CSL’s stock grew similarly to FBIN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CSLFBIN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CSL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
FBIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DOCT39.570.06
+0.15%
FT Cboe Vest US Equity Deep Bffr ETF Oct
NUHY21.420.03
+0.14%
Nuveen ESG High Yield Corporate Bd ETF
JEPI60.020.05
+0.08%
JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF
RAVI75.360.03
+0.04%
FlexShares Ultra-Short Income ETF
JANZ35.76N/A
+0.01%
TrueShares Structured Outcome JanuaryETF

CSL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CSL has been loosely correlated with GMS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CSL jumps, then GMS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CSL
1D Price
Change %
CSL100%
+0.40%
GMS - CSL
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.10%
AWI - CSL
59%
Loosely correlated
-0.58%
AZEK - CSL
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.28%
FBIN - CSL
57%
Loosely correlated
-1.18%
MAS - CSL
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.29%
More

FBIN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FBIN has been closely correlated with MAS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FBIN jumps, then MAS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FBIN
1D Price
Change %
FBIN100%
-1.18%
MAS - FBIN
83%
Closely correlated
+0.29%
TREX - FBIN
71%
Closely correlated
+0.43%
BXC - FBIN
70%
Closely correlated
+1.61%
BLDR - FBIN
68%
Closely correlated
+0.69%
LPX - FBIN
67%
Closely correlated
-1.18%
More