CSL
Price
$382.83
Change
-$2.49 (-0.65%)
Updated
Aug 6 closing price
Capitalization
15.2B
76 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FBIN
Price
$50.35
Change
-$1.94 (-3.71%)
Updated
Aug 6 closing price
Capitalization
6.01B
82 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CSL vs FBIN

CSL vs FBIN Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CSL vs. FBIN commentary
Aug 07, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSL is a StrongBuy and FBIN is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 07, 2026
Stock price -- (CSL: $382.83 vs. FBIN: $50.35)
Brand notoriety: CSL and FBIN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Building Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CSL: 81% vs. FBIN: 99%
Market capitalization -- CSL: $15.2B vs. FBIN: $6.01B
CSL [@Building Products] is valued at $15.2B. FBIN’s [@Building Products] market capitalization is $6.01B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Building Products] industry ranges from $106.4B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Building Products] industry is $11.19B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CSL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFBIN’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CSL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FBIN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CSL is a better buy in the long-term than FBIN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CSL’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FBIN’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CSL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FBIN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CSL is a better buy in the short-term than FBIN.

Price Growth

CSL (@Building Products) experienced а +3.50% price change this week, while FBIN (@Building Products) price change was +2.23% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Building Products industry was +9.27%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.81%.

Reported Earning Dates

CSL is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.

FBIN is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Building Products (+9.27% weekly)

The industry manufactures products used in the construction of residential and commercial buildings. The process involves using materials and other products, and processing them to create finished items such as doors, windows, light fittings, floor coverings, climate control products and other building components and home improvement products. Masco Corporation, Allegion PLC and Lennox International Inc. are major manufacturers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSL($15.2B) has a higher market cap than FBIN($6.01B). FBIN has higher P/E ratio than CSL: FBIN (40.60) vs CSL (21.73). CSL YTD gains are higher at: 20.410 vs. FBIN (1.875). CSL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.25B vs. FBIN (668M). CSL has more cash in the bank: 665M vs. FBIN (223M). CSL (2.89B) and FBIN (2.96B) have identical debt. CSL has higher revenues than FBIN: CSL (5.1B) vs FBIN (4.44B).
CSLFBINCSL / FBIN
Capitalization15.2B6.01B253%
EBITDA1.25B668M187%
Gain YTD20.4101.8751,088%
P/E Ratio21.7340.6054%
Revenue5.1B4.44B115%
Total Cash665M223M298%
Total Debt2.89B2.96B97%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CSL vs FBIN: Fundamental Ratings
CSL
FBIN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3216
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
56
Fair valued
17
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
45100
SMR RATING
1..100
2666
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5048
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
407
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
55n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FBIN's Valuation (17) in the Building Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CSL (56) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry. This means that FBIN’s stock grew somewhat faster than CSL’s over the last 12 months.

CSL's Profit vs Risk Rating (45) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FBIN (100) in the Building Products industry. This means that CSL’s stock grew somewhat faster than FBIN’s over the last 12 months.

CSL's SMR Rating (26) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FBIN (66) in the Building Products industry. This means that CSL’s stock grew somewhat faster than FBIN’s over the last 12 months.

FBIN's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Building Products industry is in the same range as CSL (50) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry. This means that FBIN’s stock grew similarly to CSL’s over the last 12 months.

FBIN's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the Building Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CSL (40) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry. This means that FBIN’s stock grew somewhat faster than CSL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CSLFBIN
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
52%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
47%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CSL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FBIN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NFE0.340.01
+2.72%
New Fortress Energy
TMQ3.600.08
+2.27%
Trilogy Metals
BEKE16.920.03
+0.18%
KE Holdings
MZTI110.29-0.97
-0.87%
The Marzetti Company
LCFY2.25-0.08
-3.43%
Locafy Limited

CSL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CSL has been loosely correlated with BLDR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CSL jumps, then BLDR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CSL
1D Price
Change %
CSL100%
-0.65%
BLDR - CSL
61%
Loosely correlated
-4.42%
GFF - CSL
59%
Loosely correlated
+3.39%
LPX - CSL
57%
Loosely correlated
-1.87%
MAS - CSL
57%
Loosely correlated
-2.39%
OC - CSL
56%
Loosely correlated
-1.23%
More

FBIN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FBIN has been closely correlated with MAS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FBIN jumps, then MAS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FBIN
1D Price
Change %
FBIN100%
-3.71%
MAS - FBIN
75%
Closely correlated
-2.39%
BLDR - FBIN
75%
Closely correlated
-4.42%
BXC - FBIN
70%
Closely correlated
+17.73%
OC - FBIN
69%
Closely correlated
-1.23%
CSL - FBIN
59%
Loosely correlated
-0.65%
More