CSL
Price
$376.47
Change
-$0.51 (-0.14%)
Updated
Jun 27, 12:55 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
18.83B
26 days until earnings call
GMS
Price
$98.63
Change
+$0.08 (+0.08%)
Updated
Jun 27, 12:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.88B
62 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CSL vs GMS

Header iconCSL vs GMS Comparison
Open Charts CSL vs GMSBanner chart's image
Carlisle Companies
Price$376.47
Change-$0.51 (-0.14%)
Volume$100
Capitalization18.83B
GMS
Price$98.63
Change+$0.08 (+0.08%)
Volume$151
Capitalization3.88B
CSL vs GMS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CSL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GMS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CSL vs. GMS commentary
Jun 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSL is a StrongBuy and GMS is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 27, 2025
Stock price -- (CSL: $376.98 vs. GMS: $98.54)
Brand notoriety: CSL and GMS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Building Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CSL: 72% vs. GMS: 118%
Market capitalization -- CSL: $18.83B vs. GMS: $3.88B
CSL [@Building Products] is valued at $18.83B. GMS’s [@Building Products] market capitalization is $3.88B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Building Products] industry ranges from $67.38B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Building Products] industry is $12.13B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CSL’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileGMS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CSL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • GMS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, GMS is a better buy in the long-term than CSL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CSL’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GMS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CSL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • GMS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CSL and GMS are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CSL (@Building Products) experienced а +6.03% price change this week, while GMS (@Building Products) price change was +21.64% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Building Products industry was +3.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.38%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.52%.

Reported Earning Dates

CSL is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2025.

GMS is expected to report earnings on Aug 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Building Products (+3.24% weekly)

The industry manufactures products used in the construction of residential and commercial buildings. The process involves using materials and other products, and processing them to create finished items such as doors, windows, light fittings, floor coverings, climate control products and other building components and home improvement products. Masco Corporation, Allegion PLC and Lennox International Inc. are major manufacturers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSL($18.8B) has a higher market cap than GMS($3.88B). CSL has higher P/E ratio than GMS: CSL (27.70) vs GMS (13.67). GMS YTD gains are higher at: 16.162 vs. CSL (2.745). CSL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.21B vs. GMS (593M). CSL has more cash in the bank: 577M vs. GMS (88.3M). GMS has less debt than CSL: GMS (1.23B) vs CSL (2.32B). GMS has higher revenues than CSL: GMS (5.39B) vs CSL (4.59B).
CSLGMSCSL / GMS
Capitalization18.8B3.88B485%
EBITDA1.21B593M204%
Gain YTD2.74516.16217%
P/E Ratio27.7013.67203%
Revenue4.59B5.39B85%
Total Cash577M88.3M653%
Total Debt2.32B1.23B190%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CSL vs GMS: Fundamental Ratings
CSL
GMS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5822
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
67
Overvalued
66
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2517
SMR RATING
1..100
1966
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5838
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
744
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GMS's Valuation (66) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is in the same range as CSL (67) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry. This means that GMS’s stock grew similarly to CSL’s over the last 12 months.

GMS's Profit vs Risk Rating (17) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is in the same range as CSL (25) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry. This means that GMS’s stock grew similarly to CSL’s over the last 12 months.

CSL's SMR Rating (19) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GMS (66) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that CSL’s stock grew somewhat faster than GMS’s over the last 12 months.

GMS's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is in the same range as CSL (58) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry. This means that GMS’s stock grew similarly to CSL’s over the last 12 months.

GMS's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is significantly better than the same rating for CSL (74) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry. This means that GMS’s stock grew significantly faster than CSL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CSLGMS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
44%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CSL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GMS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DFNL42.660.48
+1.14%
Davis Select Financial ETF
NIE23.590.23
+0.98%
Virtus Equity & Convertible Income Fund
PTLC50.240.42
+0.84%
Pacer Trendpilot™ US Large Cap ETF
HNW12.370.04
+0.34%
Pioneer Diversified High Income Fund
FLXR39.510.09
+0.23%
TCW Flexible Income ETF

CSL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CSL has been loosely correlated with FBIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CSL jumps, then FBIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CSL
1D Price
Change %
CSL100%
+1.40%
FBIN - CSL
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.21%
GMS - CSL
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.26%
MAS - CSL
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.87%
WMS - CSL
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.22%
AWI - CSL
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.73%
More

GMS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GMS has been closely correlated with BXC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GMS jumps, then BXC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GMS
1D Price
Change %
GMS100%
-0.26%
BXC - GMS
69%
Closely correlated
+0.63%
BLDR - GMS
66%
Loosely correlated
+0.02%
IR - GMS
63%
Loosely correlated
+1.99%
AWI - GMS
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.73%
OC - GMS
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.87%
More