CSL
Price
$352.14
Change
+$7.10 (+2.06%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
13.98B
45 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MAS
Price
$72.70
Change
+$1.28 (+1.79%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
14.34B
51 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CSL vs MAS

CSL vs MAS Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CSL vs. MAS commentary
Sep 07, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSL is a StrongBuy and MAS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 07, 2026
Stock price -- (CSL: $352.14 vs. MAS: $72.70)
Brand notoriety: CSL and MAS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Building Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CSL: 71% vs. MAS: 87%
Market capitalization -- CSL: $13.98B vs. MAS: $14.34B
CSL [@Building Products] is valued at $13.98B. MAS’s [@Building Products] market capitalization is $14.34B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Building Products] industry ranges from $98.55B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Building Products] industry is $10.02B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CSL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMAS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CSL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MAS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CSL is a better buy in the long-term than MAS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CSL’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MAS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CSL’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • MAS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MAS is a better buy in the short-term than CSL.

Price Growth

CSL (@Building Products) experienced а -1.23% price change this week, while MAS (@Building Products) price change was -0.75% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Building Products industry was +4.93%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.57%.

Reported Earning Dates

CSL is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.

MAS is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Building Products (+4.93% weekly)

The industry manufactures products used in the construction of residential and commercial buildings. The process involves using materials and other products, and processing them to create finished items such as doors, windows, light fittings, floor coverings, climate control products and other building components and home improvement products. Masco Corporation, Allegion PLC and Lennox International Inc. are major manufacturers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MAS($14.3B) and CSL($14B) have the same market capitalization . CSL has higher P/E ratio than MAS: CSL (19.99) vs MAS (16.75). MAS YTD gains are higher at: 16.109 vs. CSL (11.147). MAS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.34B vs. CSL (1.25B). CSL has more cash in the bank: 665M vs. MAS (548M). CSL has less debt than MAS: CSL (2.89B) vs MAS (3.49B). MAS has higher revenues than CSL: MAS (7.62B) vs CSL (5.1B).
CSLMASCSL / MAS
Capitalization14B14.3B98%
EBITDA1.25B1.34B93%
Gain YTD11.14716.10969%
P/E Ratio19.9916.75119%
Revenue5.1B7.62B67%
Total Cash665M548M121%
Total Debt2.89B3.49B83%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CSL vs MAS: Fundamental Ratings
CSL
MAS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
48
Fair valued
94
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5258
SMR RATING
1..100
263
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6052
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5662
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CSL's Valuation (48) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MAS (94) in the Building Products industry. This means that CSL’s stock grew somewhat faster than MAS’s over the last 12 months.

CSL's Profit vs Risk Rating (52) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry is in the same range as MAS (58) in the Building Products industry. This means that CSL’s stock grew similarly to MAS’s over the last 12 months.

MAS's SMR Rating (3) in the Building Products industry is in the same range as CSL (26) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry. This means that MAS’s stock grew similarly to CSL’s over the last 12 months.

MAS's Price Growth Rating (52) in the Building Products industry is in the same range as CSL (60) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry. This means that MAS’s stock grew similarly to CSL’s over the last 12 months.

CSL's P/E Growth Rating (56) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry is in the same range as MAS (62) in the Building Products industry. This means that CSL’s stock grew similarly to MAS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CSLMAS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CSL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MAS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MEI15.690.37
+2.42%
Methode Electronics
IVF0.99N/A
+0.16%
INVO Fertility Inc
FCPT24.930.02
+0.08%
Four Corners Property Trust
SRFM0.67N/A
-0.49%
Surf Air Mobility
ARMK56.78-0.50
-0.87%
ARAMARK

CSL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CSL has been loosely correlated with BLDR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CSL jumps, then BLDR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CSL
1D Price
Change %
CSL100%
+2.06%
BLDR - CSL
65%
Loosely correlated
+2.51%
MAS - CSL
64%
Loosely correlated
+1.79%
GFF - CSL
64%
Loosely correlated
+1.97%
OC - CSL
60%
Loosely correlated
+2.98%
LPX - CSL
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.65%
More