CSL
Price
$334.31
Change
+$4.99 (+1.52%)
Updated
Oct 21, 12:26 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
14.08B
8 days until earnings call
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
LMB
Price
$93.06
Change
-$0.68 (-0.73%)
Updated
Oct 21, 11:36 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.09B
14 days until earnings call
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CSL vs LMB

Header iconCSL vs LMB Comparison
Open Charts CSL vs LMBBanner chart's image
Carlisle Companies
Price$334.31
Change+$4.99 (+1.52%)
Volume$758
Capitalization14.08B
Limbach Holdings
Price$93.06
Change-$0.68 (-0.73%)
Volume$1.6K
Capitalization1.09B
CSL vs LMB Comparison Chart in %
CSL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LMB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CSL vs. LMB commentary
Oct 21, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSL is a Buy and LMB is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 21, 2025
Stock price -- (CSL: $329.32 vs. LMB: $93.75)
Brand notoriety: CSL and LMB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Building Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CSL: 48% vs. LMB: 51%
Market capitalization -- CSL: $14.08B vs. LMB: $1.09B
CSL [@Building Products] is valued at $14.08B. LMB’s [@Building Products] market capitalization is $1.09B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Building Products] industry ranges from $93.09B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Building Products] industry is $10.95B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CSL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLMB’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CSL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LMB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, LMB is a better buy in the long-term than CSL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CSL’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LMB’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CSL’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • LMB’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CSL is a better buy in the short-term than LMB.

Price Growth

CSL (@Building Products) experienced а +1.25% price change this week, while LMB (@Building Products) price change was +1.80% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Building Products industry was +0.55%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.94%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.19%.

Reported Earning Dates

CSL is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

LMB is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Building Products (+0.55% weekly)

The industry manufactures products used in the construction of residential and commercial buildings. The process involves using materials and other products, and processing them to create finished items such as doors, windows, light fittings, floor coverings, climate control products and other building components and home improvement products. Masco Corporation, Allegion PLC and Lennox International Inc. are major manufacturers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSL($14.1B) has a higher market cap than LMB($1.09B). LMB has higher P/E ratio than CSL: LMB (32.11) vs CSL (18.44). LMB YTD gains are higher at: 9.598 vs. CSL (-9.983). CSL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.28B vs. LMB (59.5M). CSL has more cash in the bank: 68.4M vs. LMB (38.9M). LMB has less debt than CSL: LMB (54.4M) vs CSL (1.89B). CSL has higher revenues than LMB: CSL (5B) vs LMB (553M).
CSLLMBCSL / LMB
Capitalization14.1B1.09B1,294%
EBITDA1.28B59.5M2,143%
Gain YTD-9.9839.598-104%
P/E Ratio18.4432.1157%
Revenue5B553M905%
Total Cash68.4M38.9M176%
Total Debt1.89B54.4M3,478%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CSL vs LMB: Fundamental Ratings
CSL
LMB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2111
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
52
Fair valued
85
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3433
SMR RATING
1..100
3040
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8164
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8559
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5090

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CSL's Valuation (52) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LMB (85) in the Miscellaneous industry. This means that CSL’s stock grew somewhat faster than LMB’s over the last 12 months.

LMB's Profit vs Risk Rating (33) in the Miscellaneous industry is in the same range as CSL (34) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry. This means that LMB’s stock grew similarly to CSL’s over the last 12 months.

CSL's SMR Rating (30) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry is in the same range as LMB (40) in the Miscellaneous industry. This means that CSL’s stock grew similarly to LMB’s over the last 12 months.

LMB's Price Growth Rating (64) in the Miscellaneous industry is in the same range as CSL (81) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry. This means that LMB’s stock grew similarly to CSL’s over the last 12 months.

LMB's P/E Growth Rating (59) in the Miscellaneous industry is in the same range as CSL (85) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry. This means that LMB’s stock grew similarly to CSL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CSLLMB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 26 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CSL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LMB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ASMG24.940.61
+2.51%
Leverage Shares 2X Long Asml Daily ETF
DEHP31.620.46
+1.48%
Dimensional Em Mkts High Prof ETF
QARP57.430.59
+1.05%
Xtrackers Russell 1000 US QARP ETF
GSEW85.210.87
+1.03%
Goldman Sachs Equal Wght US Lg Cp Eq ETF
EAFG22.73N/A
N/A
Pacer Developed Mkts Csh Cow Gr Ldr ETF

LMB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LMB has been loosely correlated with JCI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LMB jumps, then JCI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LMB
1D Price
Change %
LMB100%
+2.20%
JCI - LMB
48%
Loosely correlated
+1.63%
SPXC - LMB
46%
Loosely correlated
+0.51%
TT - LMB
38%
Loosely correlated
+0.61%
TTEK - LMB
38%
Loosely correlated
+2.11%
AWI - LMB
38%
Loosely correlated
+1.00%
More