CSLMF
Price
$11.55
Change
-$0.45 (-3.75%)
Updated
Jul 24 closing price
Capitalization
105.06M
SZZL
Price
$10.08
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 25, 01:30 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
189.72M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CSLMF vs SZZL

Header iconCSLMF vs SZZL Comparison
Open Charts CSLMF vs SZZLBanner chart's image
CSLM Acquisition
Price$11.55
Change-$0.45 (-3.75%)
Volume$106
Capitalization105.06M
Sizzle Acquisition Corp II
Price$10.08
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$871
Capitalization189.72M
CSLMF vs SZZL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CSLMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CSLMF vs. SZZL commentary
Jul 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSLMF is a Hold and SZZL is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 25, 2025
Stock price -- (CSLMF: $11.55 vs. SZZL: $10.08)
Brand notoriety: CSLMF and SZZL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CSLMF: 5% vs. SZZL: 11%
Market capitalization -- CSLMF: $105.06M vs. SZZL: $189.72M
CSLMF [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $105.06M. SZZL’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $189.72M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $4.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CSLMF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSZZL’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CSLMF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SZZL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CSLMF is a better buy in the long-term than SZZL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CSLMF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • CSLMF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 1 bearish.

Price Growth

CSLMF (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а -0.43% price change this week, while SZZL (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +1.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.05%, and the average quarterly price growth was +94.09%.

Reported Earning Dates

CSLMF is expected to report earnings on May 15, 2025.

SZZL is expected to report earnings on May 15, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (+1.19% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SZZL($190M) has a higher market cap than CSLMF($105M). SZZL has higher P/E ratio than CSLMF: SZZL (1111.11) vs CSLMF (16.93). CSLMF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.14M vs. SZZL (-2.75M). CSLMF has more cash in the bank: 174K vs. SZZL (1.08K). CSLMF has less debt than SZZL: CSLMF (600K) vs SZZL (964K). CSLMF (0) and SZZL (0) have equivalent revenues.
CSLMFSZZLCSLMF / SZZL
Capitalization105M190M55%
EBITDA-1.14M-2.75M41%
Gain YTD0.435N/A-
P/E Ratio16.931111.112%
Revenue00-
Total Cash174K1.08K16,186%
Total Debt600K964K62%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CSLMF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
6%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
7%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
11%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
1%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
N/A
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
17%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CSLMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AVNM67.110.74
+1.11%
Avantis All International Mkts Eq ETF
BUZZ32.47-0.20
-0.61%
VanEck Social Sentiment ETF
NXTI30.77-0.19
-0.61%
Simplify Next Intangible Core Index ETF
INDF39.09-0.46
-1.16%
Range India Financials ETF
KBE57.77-0.98
-1.67%
SPDR® S&P Bank ETF

SZZL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SZZL has been closely correlated with SZZLU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SZZL jumps, then SZZLU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SZZL
1D Price
Change %
SZZL100%
-0.05%
SZZLU - SZZL
81%
Closely correlated
N/A
ASUUF - SZZL
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PLMIU - SZZL
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CSLMF - SZZL
24%
Poorly correlated
-3.75%
ASCBF - SZZL
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More