CSLMF
Price
$12.05
Change
+$0.08 (+0.67%)
Updated
Jul 1 closing price
Capitalization
105.06M
VMCAF
Price
$12.40
Change
+$0.21 (+1.72%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
132.59M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CSLMF vs VMCAF

Header iconCSLMF vs VMCAF Comparison
Open Charts CSLMF vs VMCAFBanner chart's image
CSLM Acquisition
Price$12.05
Change+$0.08 (+0.67%)
Volume$6.31K
Capitalization105.06M
Valuence Merger Corp I
Price$12.40
Change+$0.21 (+1.72%)
Volume$100
Capitalization132.59M
CSLMF vs VMCAF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CSLMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VMCAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CSLMF vs. VMCAF commentary
Jul 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSLMF is a StrongBuy and VMCAF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 04, 2025
Stock price -- (CSLMF: $12.05 vs. VMCAF: $12.40)
Brand notoriety: CSLMF and VMCAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CSLMF: 108% vs. VMCAF: 6%
Market capitalization -- CSLMF: $105.06M vs. VMCAF: $132.59M
CSLMF [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $105.06M. VMCAF’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $132.59M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $4.72B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CSLMF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileVMCAF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CSLMF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • VMCAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CSLMF and VMCAF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CSLMF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VMCAF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CSLMF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • VMCAF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CSLMF is a better buy in the short-term than VMCAF.

Price Growth

CSLMF (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а +0.67% price change this week, while VMCAF (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was +1.72% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was -1.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.69%.

Reported Earning Dates

CSLMF is expected to report earnings on Apr 11, 2025.

VMCAF is expected to report earnings on May 15, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (-1.49% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VMCAF($133M) has a higher market cap than CSLMF($105M). VMCAF has higher P/E ratio than CSLMF: VMCAF (43.69) vs CSLMF (16.93). VMCAF YTD gains are higher at: 7.639 vs. CSLMF (4.783). CSLMF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.14M vs. VMCAF (-1.39M). VMCAF has more cash in the bank: 685K vs. CSLMF (174K). CSLMF has less debt than VMCAF: CSLMF (600K) vs VMCAF (2.26M). CSLMF (0) and VMCAF (0) have equivalent revenues.
CSLMFVMCAFCSLMF / VMCAF
Capitalization105M133M79%
EBITDA-1.14M-1.39M82%
Gain YTD4.7837.63963%
P/E Ratio16.9343.6939%
Revenue00-
Total Cash174K685K25%
Total Debt600K2.26M27%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CSLMFVMCAF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
8%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
7%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
26%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
17%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
24%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
15%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
25%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
2%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
9%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CSLMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VMCAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FHKCX44.85N/A
N/A
Fidelity China Region
FCVCX16.25N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value C
DDHRF2.06N/A
N/A
Dream Impact Trust
KNCAF3.51N/A
N/A
Konica Minolta Inc.
FHELF0.02N/A
N/A
FIRST HELIUM INC

CSLMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CSLMF and HSPO have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CSLMF and HSPO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CSLMF
1D Price
Change %
CSLMF100%
N/A
HSPO - CSLMF
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.25%
VMCAF - CSLMF
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.72%
SZZL - CSLMF
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.10%
CXAI - CSLMF
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.94%
FGMCU - CSLMF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.10%
More

VMCAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VMCAF has been loosely correlated with PORT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if VMCAF jumps, then PORT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VMCAF
1D Price
Change %
VMCAF100%
+1.72%
PORT - VMCAF
36%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CSLMF - VMCAF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KVACU - VMCAF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TRTLF - VMCAF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FGMCU - VMCAF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.10%
More