CSLUF
Price
$11.59
Change
+$0.67 (+6.14%)
Updated
Jul 18 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
HCMAU
Price
$10.11
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 5, 04:44 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
N/A
Interact to see
Advertisement

CSLUF vs HCMAU

Header iconCSLUF vs HCMAU Comparison
Open Charts CSLUF vs HCMAUBanner chart's image
CSLM Acquisition
Price$11.59
Change+$0.67 (+6.14%)
Volume$1.06K
CapitalizationN/A
Hcm III Acquisition
Price$10.11
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$3.92K
CapitalizationN/A
CSLUF vs HCMAU Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CSLUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CSLUF vs. HCMAU commentary
Sep 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSLUF is a StrongBuy and HCMAU is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 05, 2025
Stock price -- (CSLUF: $11.59 vs. HCMAU: $10.11)
Brand notoriety: CSLUF and HCMAU are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CSLUF: 102% vs. HCMAU: 55%
Market capitalization -- CSLUF: $0 vs. HCMAU: $0
CSLUF [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $0. HCMAU’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $172.82M.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CSLUF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHCMAU’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CSLUF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • HCMAU’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CSLUF and HCMAU are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CSLUF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • CSLUF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.

Price Growth

CSLUF (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while HCMAU (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was -0.15% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was -0.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.78%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (-0.01% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSLUFHCMAUCSLUF / HCMAU
CapitalizationN/AN/A-
EBITDA-2.53MN/A-
Gain YTD-0.855N/A-
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue0N/A-
Total Cash14KN/A-
Total Debt3.36MN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CSLUF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
11%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
11%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
17%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
20%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
12%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CSLUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ITDC33.200.20
+0.60%
iShares LifePath Target Date 2035 ETF
ISPY43.740.24
+0.55%
ProShares S&P 500 High Income ETF
CADNZD1.23N/A
N/A
Canadian Dollar - New Zealand Dollar
CEPI38.99N/A
-0.01%
Rex Crypto Equity Premium Income ETF
THD58.35-0.33
-0.56%
iShares MSCI Thailand ETF

CSLUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CSLUF and NPWR have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CSLUF and NPWR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CSLUF
1D Price
Change %
CSLUF100%
N/A
NPWR - CSLUF
32%
Poorly correlated
-1.33%
SZZLU - CSLUF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HCMAU - CSLUF
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.10%
FGMCU - CSLUF
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.29%
AIMTF - CSLUF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

HCMAU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HCMAU has been loosely correlated with PLMIU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HCMAU jumps, then PLMIU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HCMAU
1D Price
Change %
HCMAU100%
-0.10%
PLMIU - HCMAU
42%
Loosely correlated
N/A
FACT - HCMAU
40%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CMCAF - HCMAU
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
DYCQ - HCMAU
33%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SZZLU - HCMAU
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More