CSLUF
Price
$11.59
Change
+$0.67 (+6.14%)
Updated
Jul 18 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
NPWR
Price
$2.19
Change
-$0.04 (-1.79%)
Updated
Sep 5, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
173.68M
74 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CSLUF vs NPWR

Header iconCSLUF vs NPWR Comparison
Open Charts CSLUF vs NPWRBanner chart's image
CSLM Acquisition
Price$11.59
Change+$0.67 (+6.14%)
Volume$1.06K
CapitalizationN/A
NET Power
Price$2.19
Change-$0.04 (-1.79%)
Volume$6.25K
Capitalization173.68M
CSLUF vs NPWR Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CSLUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NPWR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CSLUF vs. NPWR commentary
Sep 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSLUF is a StrongBuy and NPWR is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 05, 2025
Stock price -- (CSLUF: $11.59 vs. NPWR: $2.23)
Brand notoriety: CSLUF and NPWR are both not notable
CSLUF represents the Financial Conglomerates, while NPWR is part of the Industrial Machinery industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CSLUF: 102% vs. NPWR: 31%
Market capitalization -- CSLUF: $0 vs. NPWR: $173.68M
CSLUF [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $0. NPWR’s [@Industrial Machinery] market capitalization is $173.68M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Industrial Machinery] industry ranges from $209.06B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $172.82M. The average market capitalization across the [@Industrial Machinery] industry is $13.58B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CSLUF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNPWR’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CSLUF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NPWR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CSLUF and NPWR are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CSLUF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NPWR’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CSLUF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • NPWR’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CSLUF is a better buy in the short-term than NPWR.

Price Growth

CSLUF (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while NPWR (@Industrial Machinery) price change was -12.89% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was -0.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.78%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Machinery industry was -0.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.88%.

Reported Earning Dates

NPWR is expected to report earnings on Nov 18, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (-0.01% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

@Industrial Machinery (-0.38% weekly)

The industry makes and maintains machines for consumers, the industry, and most other companies. While it has traditionally been categorized as heavy industry, some smaller companies are also branching into the light category. The industry is pivotal in providing the equipment for production in businesses like agriculture, mining, industry and construction, gas, electricity and water utilities. It also supplies supporting equipment for almost all sectors of the economy, such as equipment for heating, and air conditioning of buildings. Illinois Tool Works Inc., Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Rockwell Automation Inc are some of the major U.S. companies operating in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSLUF YTD gains are higher at: -0.855 vs. NPWR (-78.942). CSLUF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -2.53M vs. NPWR (-117.91M). NPWR has more cash in the bank: 491M vs. CSLUF (14K). NPWR has less debt than CSLUF: NPWR (2.76M) vs CSLUF (3.36M). NPWR has higher revenues than CSLUF: NPWR (250K) vs CSLUF (0).
CSLUFNPWRCSLUF / NPWR
CapitalizationN/A174M-
EBITDA-2.53M-117.91M2%
Gain YTD-0.855-78.9421%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue0250K-
Total Cash14K491M0%
Total Debt3.36M2.76M122%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CSLUFNPWR
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
11%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
11%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
17%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
20%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
12%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CSLUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NPWR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
USTC.X0.013119-0.000187
-1.41%
TerraClassicUSD cryptocurrency
NKN.X0.025329-0.001028
-3.90%
NKN cryptocurrency
BLUR.X0.073598-0.003245
-4.22%
Blur cryptocurrency
AGIX.X0.255754-0.012699
-4.73%
SingularityNET cryptocurrency
SEI.X0.279370-0.013916
-4.74%
Sei cryptocurrency

CSLUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CSLUF and NPWR have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CSLUF and NPWR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CSLUF
1D Price
Change %
CSLUF100%
N/A
NPWR - CSLUF
32%
Poorly correlated
-1.33%
SZZLU - CSLUF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HCMAU - CSLUF
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.10%
FGMCU - CSLUF
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.29%
AIMTF - CSLUF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

NPWR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NPWR has been loosely correlated with FLS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NPWR jumps, then FLS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NPWR
1D Price
Change %
NPWR100%
-1.33%
FLS - NPWR
39%
Loosely correlated
+2.00%
CMI - NPWR
38%
Loosely correlated
+2.24%
ETN - NPWR
37%
Loosely correlated
+1.52%
EMR - NPWR
37%
Loosely correlated
+2.78%
GTLS - NPWR
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.23%
More