CSLUF
Price
$11.59
Change
+$0.67 (+6.14%)
Updated
Jul 18 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
SZZLU
Price
Loading...
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Loading...
Capitalization
N/A
Interact to see
Advertisement

CSLUF vs SZZLU

Header iconCSLUF vs SZZLU Comparison
Open Charts CSLUF vs SZZLUBanner chart's image
CSLM Acquisition
Price$11.59
Change+$0.67 (+6.14%)
Volume$1.06K
CapitalizationN/A
Sizzle Acquisition Corp II
PriceLoading...
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
CSLUF vs SZZLU Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CSLUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CSLUF vs. SZZLU commentary
Jul 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSLUF is a Hold and SZZLU is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 20, 2025
Stock price -- (CSLUF: $11.59 vs. SZZLU: $10.19)
Brand notoriety: CSLUF and SZZLU are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CSLUF: 82% vs. SZZLU: 6%
Market capitalization -- CSLUF: $0 vs. SZZLU: $0
CSLUF [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $0. SZZLU’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $4.81B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CSLUF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSZZLU’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CSLUF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SZZLU’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CSLUF and SZZLU are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CSLUF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • CSLUF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 1 bearish.

Price Growth

CSLUF (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а +6.14% price change this week, while SZZLU (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was -2.36% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +2.48%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.62%, and the average quarterly price growth was +92.36%.

Reported Earning Dates

CSLUF is expected to report earnings on May 15, 2025.

SZZLU is expected to report earnings on May 15, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (+2.48% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSLUF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.14M vs. SZZLU (-2.75M). CSLUF has more cash in the bank: 174K vs. SZZLU (1.08K). CSLUF has less debt than SZZLU: CSLUF (600K) vs SZZLU (964K). CSLUF (0) and SZZLU (0) have equivalent revenues.
CSLUFSZZLUCSLUF / SZZLU
CapitalizationN/AN/A-
EBITDA-1.14M-2.75M41%
Gain YTD-0.855N/A-
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash174K1.08K16,186%
Total Debt600K964K62%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CSLUF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
29%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
6%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
15%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
17%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CSLUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BSTZ21.220.40
+1.92%
BlackRock Science and Technology Term Trust
PFIG24.010.05
+0.19%
Invesco Fdmtl Invmt Grd Corp Bd ETF
JJGTF26.00N/A
N/A
Barclays Bank PLC
JULP28.96N/A
N/A
PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - Jul
SMMV41.73-0.22
-0.53%
iShares MSCI USA Sm-Cp Min Vol Fctr ETF

CSLUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CSLUF and NPWR have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CSLUF and NPWR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CSLUF
1D Price
Change %
CSLUF100%
+6.14%
NPWR - CSLUF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SZZLU - CSLUF
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.06%
FGMCU - CSLUF
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.10%
AIMTF - CSLUF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PORT - CSLUF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SZZLU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SZZLU has been loosely correlated with AACIU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SZZLU jumps, then AACIU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SZZLU
1D Price
Change %
SZZLU100%
-0.06%
AACIU - SZZLU
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
HYAC - SZZLU
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.09%
VMCUF - SZZLU
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CSLUF - SZZLU
23%
Poorly correlated
+6.14%
ASCBF - SZZLU
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.86%
More