Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSMFX vs FSMAX
CSMFX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts CSMFX vs FSMAX
CSMFX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSMFX vs. FSMAX commentary
Jul 25, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSMFX is a Hold and FSMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 43.5B vs. CSMFX (4.15B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than CSMFX: FSMAX (0.48) vs CSMFX (0.01). CSMFX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: CSMFX (9 years) vs FSMAX (15 years). CSMFX (1.99) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). CSMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSMFX: FSMAX (0) vs CSMFX (1000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.08 vs. CSMFX (7.96). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.56 vs. CSMFX (0.56).
| CSMFX | FSMAX | CSMFX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.99 | 0.04 | 5,686% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.99 | 0.04 | 5,686% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.863 | 13.698 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.15B | 43.5B | 10% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.01 | 0.48 | 1% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.96 | 20.08 | 40% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.84 | 58.16 | 46% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.56 | 33.56 | 2% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 132.04 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers