Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSMFX vs FSMDX
CSMFX vs FSMDX Comparison
Open Charts CSMFX vs FSMDX
CSMFX vs FSMDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSMFX vs. FSMDX commentary
Sep 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSMFX is a Hold and FSMDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 53.1B vs. CSMFX (4.2B). FSMDX pays higher dividends than CSMFX: FSMDX (0.75) vs CSMFX (0.01). CSMFX was incepted earlier than FSMDX: CSMFX (9 years) vs FSMDX (15 years). CSMFX (1.99) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). CSMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSMFX: FSMDX (0) vs CSMFX (1000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.97 vs. CSMFX (6.86). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 40.62 vs. CSMFX (-2.16).
| CSMFX | FSMDX | CSMFX / FSMDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.99 | 0.03 | 7,960% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.99 | 0.03 | 7,960% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.819 | 16.734 | 77% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.2B | 53.1B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.01 | 0.75 | 1% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.86 | 17.97 | 38% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.88 | 56.78 | 53% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.16 | 40.62 | -5% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 165.12 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement