Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSMMX vs GFACX
CSMMX vs GFACX Comparison
Open Charts CSMMX vs GFACX
CSMMX vs GFACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSMMX vs. GFACX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSMMX is a Hold and GFACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. CSMMX (3.66B). CSMMX (0.00) and GFACX (0.00) have matching dividends . CSMMX was incepted earlier than GFACX: CSMMX (21 years) vs GFACX (25 years). CSMMX (1.72) is less costly to investors than GFACX (1.35). CSMMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. GFACX (32.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSMMX: GFACX (250) vs CSMMX (1000). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.89 vs. CSMMX (1.10). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 6.08 vs. CSMMX (-20.38).
| CSMMX | GFACX | CSMMX / GFACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 1.35 | 127% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 1.35 | 127% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.952 | 5.973 | 150% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.66B | 361B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.10 | 5.89 | 19% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.19 | 36.71 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | -20.38 | 6.08 | -335% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.66 | 88.28 | 63% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement