Ad is loading...
CSMMX vs GFAFX
CSMMX vs GFAFX Comparison
Open Charts CSMMX vs GFAFX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$68.86
Change+$1.71 (+2.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets267.42B
CSMMX vs GFAFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSMMX vs. GFAFX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSMMX is a Buy and GFAFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 267B vs. CSMMX (2.89B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than CSMMX: GFAFX (0.35) vs CSMMX (0.00). CSMMX was incepted earlier than GFAFX: CSMMX (19 years) vs GFAFX (24 years). CSMMX (1.73) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). CSMMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSMMX: GFAFX (250) vs CSMMX (1000). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.43 vs. CSMMX (-4.70). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 37.63 vs. CSMMX (0.78).
| CSMMX | GFAFX | CSMMX / GFAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.73 | 0.67 | 258% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.73 | 0.67 | 258% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -19.536 | -10.941 | 179% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.89B | 267B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.35 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.70 | -3.43 | 137% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.85 | 9.70 | 29% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.78 | 37.63 | 2% |
| Returns for 10 years | 9.20 | 45.42 | 20% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...