Ad is loading...
CSMMX vs GFAFX
CSMMX vs GFAFX Comparison
Open Charts CSMMX vs GFAFX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$66.25
Change-$3.95 (-5.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets279.82B
CSMMX vs GFAFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSMMX vs. GFAFX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSMMX is a Hold and GFAFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 280B vs. CSMMX (3.08B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than CSMMX: GFAFX (0.35) vs CSMMX (0.00). CSMMX was incepted earlier than GFAFX: CSMMX (19 years) vs GFAFX (24 years). CSMMX (1.73) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). CSMMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSMMX: GFAFX (250) vs CSMMX (1000). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.16 vs. CSMMX (-0.46). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 71.15 vs. CSMMX (28.46).
| CSMMX | GFAFX | CSMMX / GFAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.73 | 0.67 | 258% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.73 | 0.67 | 258% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -12.623 | -4.826 | 262% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.08B | 280B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.35 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.46 | 0.16 | -281% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.16 | 5.18 | -22% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.46 | 71.15 | 40% |
| Returns for 10 years | 19.89 | 60.48 | 33% |