Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSMMX vs GFAFX
CSMMX vs GFAFX Comparison
Open Charts CSMMX vs GFAFX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$88.09
Change+$1.11 (+1.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.91B
CSMMX vs GFAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSMMX vs. GFAFX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSMMX is a StrongBuy and GFAFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 337B vs. CSMMX (3.75B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than CSMMX: GFAFX (0.29) vs CSMMX (0.00). CSMMX was incepted earlier than GFAFX: CSMMX (20 years) vs GFAFX (25 years). CSMMX (1.73) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). CSMMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSMMX: GFAFX (250) vs CSMMX (1000). CSMMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.10 vs. GFAFX (12.33). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 43.94 vs. CSMMX (3.89).
| CSMMX | GFAFX | CSMMX / GFAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.73 | 0.67 | 258% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.73 | 0.67 | 258% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.087 | 19.428 | 62% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.75B | 337B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.29 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.10 | 12.33 | 106% |
| Returns for 3 years | 70.37 | 73.02 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.89 | 43.94 | 9% |
| Returns for 10 years | 53.79 | 98.90 | 54% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement