Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSMMX vs GFAFX
CSMMX vs GFAFX Comparison
Open Charts CSMMX vs GFAFX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$75.18
Change+$0.27 (+0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets302.2B
CSMMX vs GFAFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSMMX vs. GFAFX commentary
May 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSMMX is a Buy and GFAFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 302B vs. CSMMX (3.35B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than CSMMX: GFAFX (0.35) vs CSMMX (0.00). CSMMX was incepted earlier than GFAFX: CSMMX (20 years) vs GFAFX (24 years). CSMMX (1.73) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). CSMMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSMMX: GFAFX (250) vs CSMMX (1000). CSMMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.10 vs. GFAFX (5.38). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 46.93 vs. CSMMX (9.33).
| CSMMX | GFAFX | CSMMX / GFAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.73 | 0.67 | 258% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.73 | 0.67 | 258% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.791 | 1.559 | -243% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.35B | 302B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.35 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.10 | 5.38 | 132% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.87 | 40.82 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.33 | 46.93 | 20% |
| Returns for 10 years | 29.71 | 66.01 | 45% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers