Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSMMX vs GFAFX
CSMMX vs GFAFX Comparison
Open Charts CSMMX vs GFAFX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$85.38
Change+$0.21 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets331.65B
CSMMX vs GFAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSMMX vs. GFAFX commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSMMX is a StrongBuy and GFAFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. CSMMX (3.69B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than CSMMX: GFAFX (0.29) vs CSMMX (0.00). CSMMX was incepted earlier than GFAFX: CSMMX (20 years) vs GFAFX (25 years). CSMMX (1.73) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). CSMMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSMMX: GFAFX (250) vs CSMMX (1000). CSMMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.95 vs. GFAFX (18.40). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 42.23 vs. CSMMX (3.52).
| CSMMX | GFAFX | CSMMX / GFAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.73 | 0.67 | 258% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.73 | 0.67 | 258% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.787 | 15.754 | 56% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.69B | 332B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.29 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.95 | 18.40 | 119% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.15 | 60.12 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.52 | 42.23 | 8% |
| Returns for 10 years | 54.96 | 99.75 | 55% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement