Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSMMX vs GFAFX
CSMMX vs GFAFX Comparison
Open Charts CSMMX vs GFAFX
CSMMX vs GFAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSMMX vs. GFAFX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSMMX is a Buy and GFAFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. CSMMX (3.57B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than CSMMX: GFAFX (0.20) vs CSMMX (0.00). CSMMX was incepted earlier than GFAFX: CSMMX (21 years) vs GFAFX (25 years). CSMMX (1.72) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.65). CSMMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. GFAFX (32.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSMMX: GFAFX (250) vs CSMMX (1000). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.25 vs. CSMMX (-6.30). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 15.72 vs. CSMMX (-22.19).
| CSMMX | GFAFX | CSMMX / GFAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 0.65 | 265% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 0.65 | 265% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.739 | 7.134 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.57B | 357B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.20 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.30 | 4.25 | -148% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.36 | 39.15 | 80% |
| Returns for 5 years | -22.19 | 15.72 | -141% |
| Returns for 10 years | 42.58 | 102.45 | 42% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement