Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSMMX vs GFAFX
CSMMX vs GFAFX Comparison
Open Charts CSMMX vs GFAFX
CSMMX vs GFAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSMMX vs. GFAFX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSMMX is a Hold and GFAFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. CSMMX (3.66B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than CSMMX: GFAFX (0.20) vs CSMMX (0.00). CSMMX was incepted earlier than GFAFX: CSMMX (21 years) vs GFAFX (25 years). CSMMX (1.72) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.65). CSMMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. GFAFX (32.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSMMX: GFAFX (250) vs CSMMX (1000). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.03 vs. CSMMX (1.10). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 18.91 vs. CSMMX (-20.38).
| CSMMX | GFAFX | CSMMX / GFAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 0.65 | 265% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 0.65 | 265% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.952 | 8.691 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.66B | 361B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.20 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.10 | 12.03 | 9% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.19 | 48.36 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | -20.38 | 18.91 | -108% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.66 | 117.77 | 47% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers