Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSMMX vs GFFFX
CSMMX vs GFFFX Comparison
Open Charts CSMMX vs GFFFX
CSMMX vs GFFFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSMMX vs. GFFFX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSMMX is a Buy and GFFFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. CSMMX (3.31B). GFFFX pays higher dividends than CSMMX: GFFFX (0.42) vs CSMMX (0.00). CSMMX was incepted earlier than GFFFX: CSMMX (21 years) vs GFFFX (18 years). CSMMX (1.72) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). CSMMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. GFFFX (32.00). GFFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSMMX: GFFFX (250) vs CSMMX (1000). GFFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.34 vs. CSMMX (-17.67). GFFFX return over 5 years is better than : 14.35 vs. CSMMX (-26.42).
| CSMMX | GFFFX | CSMMX / GFFFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 0.40 | 430% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 0.40 | 430% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.771 | 9.237 | 19% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.31B | 353B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.42 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -17.67 | 0.34 | -5,243% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.03 | 44.00 | 64% |
| Returns for 5 years | -26.42 | 14.35 | -184% |
| Returns for 10 years | 36.12 | 108.77 | 33% |