Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSMMX vs GFFFX
CSMMX vs GFFFX Comparison
Open Charts CSMMX vs GFFFX
CSMMX vs GFFFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSMMX vs. GFFFX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSMMX is a Buy and GFFFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. CSMMX (3.57B). GFFFX pays higher dividends than CSMMX: GFFFX (0.42) vs CSMMX (0.00). CSMMX was incepted earlier than GFFFX: CSMMX (21 years) vs GFFFX (18 years). CSMMX (1.72) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). CSMMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. GFFFX (32.00). GFFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSMMX: GFFFX (250) vs CSMMX (1000). GFFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.56 vs. CSMMX (-6.30). GFFFX return over 5 years is better than : 17.07 vs. CSMMX (-22.19).
| CSMMX | GFFFX | CSMMX / GFFFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 0.40 | 430% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 0.40 | 430% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.739 | 7.265 | 93% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.57B | 357B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.42 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.30 | 4.56 | -138% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.36 | 40.38 | 78% |
| Returns for 5 years | -22.19 | 17.07 | -130% |
| Returns for 10 years | 42.58 | 104.90 | 41% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement