Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSMMX vs GFFFX
CSMMX vs GFFFX Comparison
Open Charts CSMMX vs GFFFX
CSMMX vs GFFFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSMMX vs. GFFFX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSMMX is a Hold and GFFFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. CSMMX (3.66B). GFFFX pays higher dividends than CSMMX: GFFFX (0.42) vs CSMMX (0.00). CSMMX was incepted earlier than GFFFX: CSMMX (21 years) vs GFFFX (18 years). CSMMX (1.72) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). CSMMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. GFFFX (32.00). GFFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSMMX: GFFFX (250) vs CSMMX (1000). GFFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.37 vs. CSMMX (1.10). GFFFX return over 5 years is better than : 20.30 vs. CSMMX (-20.38).
| CSMMX | GFFFX | CSMMX / GFFFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 0.40 | 430% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 0.40 | 430% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.952 | 8.825 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.66B | 361B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.42 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.10 | 12.37 | 9% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.19 | 49.68 | 81% |
| Returns for 5 years | -20.38 | 20.30 | -100% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.66 | 120.45 | 46% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement