Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSMMX vs RGACX
CSMMX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts CSMMX vs RGACX
CSMMX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSMMX vs. RGACX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSMMX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. CSMMX (3.57B). CSMMX (0.00) and RGACX (0.00) have matching dividends . CSMMX was incepted earlier than RGACX: CSMMX (21 years) vs RGACX (24 years). CSMMX (1.72) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.93). CSMMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RGACX (32.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSMMX: RGACX (250) vs CSMMX (1000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.68 vs. CSMMX (-6.30). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 13.46 vs. CSMMX (-22.19).
| CSMMX | RGACX | CSMMX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 0.93 | 185% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 0.93 | 185% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.739 | 6.959 | 97% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.57B | 357B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.30 | 3.68 | -171% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.36 | 37.13 | 84% |
| Returns for 5 years | -22.19 | 13.46 | -165% |
| Returns for 10 years | 42.58 | 97.58 | 44% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement