Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSMMX vs RGACX
CSMMX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts CSMMX vs RGACX
CSMMX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSMMX vs. RGACX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSMMX is a Hold and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. CSMMX (3.66B). CSMMX (0.00) and RGACX (0.00) have matching dividends . CSMMX was incepted earlier than RGACX: CSMMX (21 years) vs RGACX (24 years). CSMMX (1.72) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.93). CSMMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RGACX (32.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSMMX: RGACX (250) vs CSMMX (1000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.94 vs. CSMMX (1.10). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 13.23 vs. CSMMX (-20.38).
| CSMMX | RGACX | CSMMX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 0.93 | 185% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 0.93 | 185% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.952 | 6.185 | 145% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.66B | 361B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.10 | 7.94 | 14% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.19 | 43.05 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | -20.38 | 13.23 | -154% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.66 | 107.97 | 52% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement