Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSMUX vs FSMDX
CSMUX vs FSMDX Comparison
Open Charts CSMUX vs FSMDX
CSMUX vs FSMDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSMUX vs. FSMDX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSMUX is a Buy and FSMDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 53.1B vs. CSMUX (4.09B). FSMDX pays higher dividends than CSMUX: FSMDX (0.75) vs CSMUX (0.52). CSMUX was incepted earlier than FSMDX: CSMUX (9 years) vs FSMDX (15 years). CSMUX (0.88) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). CSMUX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). CSMUX (0) and FSMDX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.26 vs. CSMUX (2.06). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 40.31 vs. CSMUX (1.93).
| CSMUX | FSMDX | CSMUX / FSMDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.03 | 3,400% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.03 | 3,520% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.058 | 13.837 | 73% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.09B | 53.1B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.52 | 0.75 | 69% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.06 | 13.26 | 16% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.40 | 56.18 | 58% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.93 | 40.31 | 5% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 167.00 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement