Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSPAX vs EKGAX
CSPAX vs EKGAX Comparison
Open Charts CSPAX vs EKGAX
CSPAX vs EKGAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSPAX vs. EKGAX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSPAX is a Buy and EKGAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSPAX has more cash in the bank: 91.5B vs. EKGAX (111M). EKGAX pays higher dividends than CSPAX: EKGAX (1.05) vs CSPAX (0.62). CSPAX was incepted earlier than EKGAX: CSPAX (24 years) vs EKGAX (38 years). EKGAX (1.58) is less costly to investors than CSPAX (1.04). CSPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. EKGAX (36.00). EKGAX initial investment is less costly to investors than CSPAX (4%) vs CSPAX (4%). CSPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than EKGAX: CSPAX (250) vs EKGAX (1000). CSPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.72 vs. EKGAX (12.96). CSPAX return over 5 years is better than : -1.32 vs. EKGAX (-23.42).
| CSPAX | EKGAX | CSPAX / EKGAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.42 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.58 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 38 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.817 | 7.647 | 220% |
| Front Load | 4% | 6% | 61% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 91.5B | 111M | 82,432% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.62 | 1.05 | 59% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.72 | 12.96 | 183% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.58 | 15.86 | 269% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.32 | -23.42 | 6% |
| Returns for 10 years | 104.26 | 14.52 | 718% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement