Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSPAX vs EKGAX
CSPAX vs EKGAX Comparison
Open Charts CSPAX vs EKGAX
CSPAX vs EKGAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSPAX vs. EKGAX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSPAX is a Hold and EKGAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSPAX has more cash in the bank: 89B vs. EKGAX (117M). EKGAX pays higher dividends than CSPAX: EKGAX (0.99) vs CSPAX (0.60). CSPAX was incepted earlier than EKGAX: CSPAX (25 years) vs EKGAX (38 years). EKGAX (1.57) is less costly to investors than CSPAX (1.04). CSPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. EKGAX (36.00). EKGAX initial investment is less costly to investors than CSPAX (4%) vs CSPAX (4%). CSPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than EKGAX: CSPAX (250) vs EKGAX (1000). CSPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.10 vs. EKGAX (14.18). CSPAX return over 5 years is better than : -2.97 vs. EKGAX (-18.68).
| CSPAX | EKGAX | CSPAX / EKGAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.41 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.57 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 38 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.567 | 12.701 | 115% |
| Front Load | 4% | 6% | 61% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 89B | 117M | 76,068% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.60 | 0.99 | 61% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.10 | 14.18 | 106% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.37 | 19.46 | 207% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.97 | -18.68 | 16% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.19 | 9.33 | 881% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement