Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSPAX vs EKGAX
CSPAX vs EKGAX Comparison
Open Charts CSPAX vs EKGAX
CSPAX vs EKGAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSPAX vs. EKGAX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSPAX is a Buy and EKGAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSPAX has more cash in the bank: 91.4B vs. EKGAX (113M). EKGAX pays higher dividends than CSPAX: EKGAX (0.98) vs CSPAX (0.59). CSPAX was incepted earlier than EKGAX: CSPAX (25 years) vs EKGAX (39 years). EKGAX (1.57) is less costly to investors than CSPAX (1.04). CSPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. EKGAX (36.00). EKGAX initial investment is less costly to investors than CSPAX (4%) vs CSPAX (4%). CSPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than EKGAX: CSPAX (250) vs EKGAX (1000). EKGAX (9.08) and CSPAX (8.87) have marching annual gain over last year. CSPAX return over 5 years is better than : -9.59 vs. EKGAX (-22.47).
| CSPAX | EKGAX | CSPAX / EKGAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.41 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.57 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 39 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.262 | 9.920 | 124% |
| Front Load | 4% | 6% | 61% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 91.4B | 113M | 80,885% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.59 | 0.98 | 60% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.87 | 9.08 | 98% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.25 | 17.04 | 219% |
| Returns for 5 years | -9.59 | -22.47 | 43% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.39 | 8.49 | 970% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers