Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSPAX vs FBOGX
CSPAX vs FBOGX Comparison
Open Charts CSPAX vs FBOGX
CSPAX vs FBOGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSPAX vs. FBOGX commentary
Sep 21, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSPAX is a Buy and FBOGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSPAX has more cash in the bank: 91.4B vs. FBOGX (790M). FBOGX pays higher dividends than CSPAX: FBOGX (1.48) vs CSPAX (0.59). CSPAX was incepted earlier than FBOGX: CSPAX (25 years) vs FBOGX (13 years). CSPAX (1.04) is less costly to investors than FBOGX (0.98). CSPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. FBOGX (15.75). CSPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FBOGX: CSPAX (250) vs FBOGX (1000000). CSPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.01 vs. FBOGX (4.13). FBOGX (-10.60) and CSPAX (-10.63) have equivalent 5 years return.
| CSPAX | FBOGX | CSPAX / FBOGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 0.98 | 106% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 0.98 | 106% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.054 | 10.262 | 108% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 91.4B | 790M | 11,570% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.59 | 1.48 | 40% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.01 | 4.13 | 170% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.42 | 27.26 | 137% |
| Returns for 5 years | -10.63 | -10.60 | 100% |
| Returns for 10 years | 77.72 | 30.73 | 253% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers