Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSPAX vs FBOGX
CSPAX vs FBOGX Comparison
Open Charts CSPAX vs FBOGX
CSPAX vs FBOGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSPAX vs. FBOGX commentary
Jul 26, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSPAX is a Hold and FBOGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSPAX has more cash in the bank: 94.3B vs. FBOGX (802M). FBOGX pays higher dividends than CSPAX: FBOGX (1.48) vs CSPAX (0.57). CSPAX was incepted earlier than FBOGX: CSPAX (24 years) vs FBOGX (13 years). CSPAX (1.04) is less costly to investors than FBOGX (0.98). CSPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. FBOGX (15.75). CSPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FBOGX: CSPAX (250) vs FBOGX (1000000). CSPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.97 vs. FBOGX (8.02). CSPAX return over 5 years is better than : -6.79 vs. FBOGX (-10.46).
| CSPAX | FBOGX | CSPAX / FBOGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 0.98 | 106% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 0.98 | 106% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.526 | 10.262 | 103% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 94.3B | 802M | 11,758% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.57 | 1.48 | 38% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.97 | 8.02 | 137% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.99 | 19.92 | 141% |
| Returns for 5 years | -6.79 | -10.46 | 65% |
| Returns for 10 years | 81.82 | 32.43 | 252% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers