Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSPAX vs GLNKX
CSPAX vs GLNKX Comparison
Open Charts CSPAX vs GLNKX
American Funds SMALLCAP World 529A
Price$71.50
Change-$0.37 (-0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets79.34B
MFS Global New Discovery R2
Price$22.46
Change-$0.09 (-0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets68.27M
CSPAX vs GLNKX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSPAX vs. GLNKX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSPAX is a Hold and GLNKX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSPAX has more cash in the bank: 79.3B vs. GLNKX (68.3M). CSPAX pays higher dividends than GLNKX: CSPAX (0.55) vs GLNKX (0.13). CSPAX was incepted earlier than GLNKX: CSPAX (24 years) vs GLNKX (14 years). GLNKX (2.06) is less costly to investors than CSPAX (1.06). GLNKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 47.00 vs. CSPAX (32.00). GLNKX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSPAX: GLNKX (0) vs CSPAX (250). CSPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.36 vs. GLNKX (1.59). CSPAX return over 5 years is better than : 1.73 vs. GLNKX (-0.25).
| CSPAX | GLNKX | CSPAX / GLNKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.60 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 2.06 | 51% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.929 | 4.855 | 163% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 79.3B | 68.3M | 116,105% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.55 | 0.13 | 411% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.36 | 1.59 | 399% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.01 | 27.01 | 107% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.73 | -0.25 | -679% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.64 | 53.40 | 104% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement