Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSPAX vs GLNKX
CSPAX vs GLNKX Comparison
Open Charts CSPAX vs GLNKX
American Funds SMALLCAP World 529A
Price$72.64
Change-$0.18 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets80.31B
MFS Global New Discovery R2
Price$23.70
Change-$0.02 (-0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets72.02M
CSPAX vs GLNKX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSPAX vs. GLNKX commentary
Aug 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSPAX is a Hold and GLNKX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSPAX has more cash in the bank: 80.3B vs. GLNKX (72M). CSPAX pays higher dividends than GLNKX: CSPAX (0.58) vs GLNKX (0.13). CSPAX was incepted earlier than GLNKX: CSPAX (24 years) vs GLNKX (14 years). GLNKX (2.06) is less costly to investors than CSPAX (1.06). GLNKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. CSPAX (32.00). GLNKX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSPAX: GLNKX (0) vs CSPAX (250). CSPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.22 vs. GLNKX (8.43). CSPAX return over 5 years is better than : 14.95 vs. GLNKX (13.56).
| CSPAX | GLNKX | CSPAX / GLNKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.60 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 2.06 | 51% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.650 | 10.644 | 91% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 80.3B | 72M | 111,528% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.58 | 0.13 | 430% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.22 | 8.43 | 121% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.60 | 22.91 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.95 | 13.56 | 110% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.82 | 54.30 | 94% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement