Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSPAX vs GLNKX
CSPAX vs GLNKX Comparison
Open Charts CSPAX vs GLNKX
American Funds SMALLCAP World 529A
Price$74.53
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets82.15B
MFS Global New Discovery R2
Price$23.73
Change-$0.08 (-0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets72.06M
CSPAX vs GLNKX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSPAX vs. GLNKX commentary
Oct 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSPAX is a Buy and GLNKX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSPAX has more cash in the bank: 82.2B vs. GLNKX (72.1M). CSPAX pays higher dividends than GLNKX: CSPAX (0.56) vs GLNKX (0.13). CSPAX was incepted earlier than GLNKX: CSPAX (24 years) vs GLNKX (14 years). GLNKX (2.06) is less costly to investors than CSPAX (1.06). GLNKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. CSPAX (32.00). GLNKX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSPAX: GLNKX (0) vs CSPAX (250). CSPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.97 vs. GLNKX (5.98). CSPAX return over 5 years is better than : 11.38 vs. GLNKX (10.14).
| CSPAX | GLNKX | CSPAX / GLNKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.60 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 2.06 | 51% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.503 | 11.158 | 112% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 82.2B | 72.1M | 114,008% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 0.13 | 424% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.97 | 5.98 | 150% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.44 | 48.01 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.38 | 10.14 | 112% |
| Returns for 10 years | 63.85 | 62.73 | 102% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement