Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSPAX vs GLNKX
CSPAX vs GLNKX Comparison
Open Charts CSPAX vs GLNKX
CSPAX vs GLNKX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSPAX vs. GLNKX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSPAX is a Hold and GLNKX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSPAX has more cash in the bank: 94.3B vs. GLNKX (66.3M). CSPAX pays higher dividends than GLNKX: CSPAX (0.60) vs GLNKX (0.16). CSPAX was incepted earlier than GLNKX: CSPAX (24 years) vs GLNKX (15 years). GLNKX (2.01) is less costly to investors than CSPAX (1.04). GLNKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 47.00 vs. CSPAX (41.00). GLNKX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSPAX: GLNKX (0) vs CSPAX (250). CSPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.68 vs. GLNKX (5.11). GLNKX return over 5 years is better than : -5.88 vs. CSPAX (-7.10).
| CSPAX | GLNKX | CSPAX / GLNKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.60 | 65% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 2.01 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.332 | 7.475 | 138% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 94.3B | 66.3M | 142,232% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.60 | 0.16 | 371% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.68 | 5.11 | 248% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.34 | 20.21 | 135% |
| Returns for 5 years | -7.10 | -5.88 | 121% |
| Returns for 10 years | 80.33 | 58.38 | 138% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement