Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSPAX vs GLNKX
CSPAX vs GLNKX Comparison
Open Charts CSPAX vs GLNKX
CSPAX vs GLNKX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSPAX vs. GLNKX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSPAX is a Hold and GLNKX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSPAX has more cash in the bank: 88.9B vs. GLNKX (67.1M). CSPAX pays higher dividends than GLNKX: CSPAX (0.62) vs GLNKX (0.16). CSPAX was incepted earlier than GLNKX: CSPAX (24 years) vs GLNKX (14 years). GLNKX (2.01) is less costly to investors than CSPAX (1.04). GLNKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 47.00 vs. CSPAX (41.00). GLNKX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSPAX: GLNKX (0) vs CSPAX (250). CSPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.37 vs. GLNKX (5.83). GLNKX return over 5 years is better than : -1.87 vs. CSPAX (-3.23).
| CSPAX | GLNKX | CSPAX / GLNKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.60 | 65% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 2.01 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.054 | 6.811 | 177% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 88.9B | 67.1M | 132,489% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.62 | 0.16 | 381% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.37 | 5.83 | 349% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.13 | 24.76 | 150% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.23 | -1.87 | 173% |
| Returns for 10 years | 87.73 | 58.85 | 149% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers