Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSPAX vs GLNKX
CSPAX vs GLNKX Comparison
Open Charts CSPAX vs GLNKX
CSPAX vs GLNKX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSPAX vs. GLNKX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSPAX is a Buy and GLNKX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSPAX has more cash in the bank: 91.4B vs. GLNKX (65.2M). CSPAX pays higher dividends than GLNKX: CSPAX (0.59) vs GLNKX (0.16). CSPAX was incepted earlier than GLNKX: CSPAX (25 years) vs GLNKX (15 years). GLNKX (2.01) is less costly to investors than CSPAX (1.04). GLNKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 47.00 vs. CSPAX (41.00). GLNKX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSPAX: GLNKX (0) vs CSPAX (250). CSPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.87 vs. GLNKX (-0.28). CSPAX return over 5 years is better than : -9.59 vs. GLNKX (-10.14).
| CSPAX | GLNKX | CSPAX / GLNKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.60 | 65% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 2.01 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.262 | 6.325 | 194% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 91.4B | 65.2M | 140,184% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.59 | 0.16 | 367% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.87 | -0.28 | -3,168% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.25 | 23.87 | 156% |
| Returns for 5 years | -9.59 | -10.14 | 95% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.39 | 57.40 | 144% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers