Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSPAX vs GLNMX
CSPAX vs GLNMX Comparison
Open Charts CSPAX vs GLNMX
American Funds SMALLCAP World 529A
Price$73.50
Change+$0.17 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets80.75B
MFS Global New Discovery R4
Price$25.21
Change+$0.09 (+0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets71.18M
CSPAX vs GLNMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSPAX vs. GLNMX commentary
Sep 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSPAX is a Hold and GLNMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSPAX has more cash in the bank: 80.8B vs. GLNMX (71.2M). CSPAX (0.56) and GLNMX (0.56) have matching dividends . CSPAX was incepted earlier than GLNMX: CSPAX (24 years) vs GLNMX (14 years). GLNMX (1.56) is less costly to investors than CSPAX (1.06). GLNMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. CSPAX (32.00). GLNMX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSPAX: GLNMX (0) vs CSPAX (250). CSPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.84 vs. GLNMX (3.97). GLNMX return over 5 years is better than : 15.02 vs. CSPAX (13.73).
| CSPAX | GLNMX | CSPAX / GLNMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.10 | 96% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.56 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.692 | 10.224 | 105% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 80.8B | 71.2M | 113,483% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 0.56 | 101% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.84 | 3.97 | 147% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.17 | 51.53 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.73 | 15.02 | 91% |
| Returns for 10 years | 64.05 | 75.55 | 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement