Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSPAX vs GLNMX
CSPAX vs GLNMX Comparison
Open Charts CSPAX vs GLNMX
CSPAX vs GLNMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSPAX vs. GLNMX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSPAX is a Buy and GLNMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSPAX has more cash in the bank: 91.5B vs. GLNMX (67.2M). CSPAX pays higher dividends than GLNMX: CSPAX (0.62) vs GLNMX (0.53). CSPAX was incepted earlier than GLNMX: CSPAX (24 years) vs GLNMX (15 years). GLNMX (1.51) is less costly to investors than CSPAX (1.04). GLNMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 47.00 vs. CSPAX (41.00). GLNMX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSPAX: GLNMX (0) vs CSPAX (250). CSPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.72 vs. GLNMX (7.95). GLNMX return over 5 years is better than : 0.07 vs. CSPAX (-1.32).
| CSPAX | GLNMX | CSPAX / GLNMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.10 | 95% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.51 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.817 | 7.466 | 225% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 91.5B | 67.2M | 136,161% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.62 | 0.53 | 117% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.72 | 7.95 | 298% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.58 | 28.40 | 150% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.32 | 0.07 | -1,846% |
| Returns for 10 years | 104.26 | 79.45 | 131% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement