Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSPAX vs GNXAX
CSPAX vs GNXAX Comparison
Open Charts CSPAX vs GNXAX
CSPAX vs GNXAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSPAX vs. GNXAX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSPAX is a Buy and GNXAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSPAX has more cash in the bank: 91.4B vs. GNXAX (21.4M). CSPAX pays higher dividends than GNXAX: CSPAX (0.59) vs GNXAX (0.00). CSPAX was incepted earlier than GNXAX: CSPAX (25 years) vs GNXAX (9 years). GNXAX (2.59) is less costly to investors than CSPAX (1.04). GNXAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 114.00 vs. CSPAX (41.00). GNXAX initial investment is less costly to investors than CSPAX (4%) vs CSPAX (4%). CSPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than GNXAX: CSPAX (250) vs GNXAX (2500). CSPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.87 vs. GNXAX (-17.08). CSPAX return over 5 years is better than : -9.59 vs. GNXAX (-20.32).
| CSPAX | GNXAX | CSPAX / GNXAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.65 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 2.59 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.262 | -17.784 | -69% |
| Front Load | 4% | 6% | 61% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 91.4B | 21.4M | 427,103% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.59 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.87 | -17.08 | -52% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.25 | 35.74 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | -9.59 | -20.32 | 47% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.39 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers